Maidana was a good win for Khan, but I'll never forget him literally running for his life in the latter stages, and he was still hospitalised after the fight.
He certainly proved that in the fight before he faced Degale didn't he?
He proved it by handling the likes of carl froch away from home easily , and beating up Abraham . Porter is a very good fighter but a notch below Dirrell
Handled him easily? It was a very close fight that Dirrell lost.....
Froch didn't really land anything he had about 4 decent rounds where he made it close but Dirrell landed more shots and heavier shots throughout the fight
Froch didn't really land anything he had about 4 decent rounds where he made it close but Dirrell landed more shots and heavier shots throughout the fight
If you scored the fight to Dirrell, fine, but don't claim it was an easy win. It could've gone either way. Froch didn't land much because Dirrell was on his bike all fight.
If you scored the fight to Dirrell, fine, but don't claim it was an easy win. It could've gone either way. Froch didn't land much because Dirrell was on his bike all fight.
I don't think you can give the fight to froch in any way of scoring he just didn't land and got hit clean to often, how did you score brook porter by the way
If you scored the fight to Dirrell, fine, but don't claim it was an easy win. It could've gone either way. Froch didn't land much because Dirrell was on his bike all fight.
I was there and close to the action , I gave it to Dirrel by one round my two pals gave it Carl by the same margin......far from an easy win.
I was one of the few people in the sport to recognise that Fury would beat Klitschko with ease. Your the guy who picked him to lose to Dereck Chisora ffs
I don't claim to be a boxing guru, but i can definitely judge and pick a fight better than you can.
FYI. Brook is "proven". His win over Porter is miles better win than anything Khan has achieved at the weight. Brook times Khan coming in and knocks him the **** out. In fact Brook is more of a technician than Khan is.
You're a Fury fan boy and that's what your prediction was based on. And you didn't originally picked him to beat Wlad on points, you said he'd stop him. Basically your predictions changed in the same rate and time as Fury's.
And don't act like you were sure Fury would beat him, I offered you a real money bet and you chickened out saying I'd stalk you after I've won
at you bringing up the Chisora prediction every time, like it suppouse to bother me. This is boxing, people are wrong all the time.
At least I don't get emotional in every Wilder or Haye thread whenever someone questions Fury's 'greatness'.
Porter win being better than any Khan win - I won't bother with a reply to that, it's just simply not true.
You're a Fury fan boy and that's what your prediction was based on. And you didn't originally picked him to beat Wlad on points, you said he'd stop him. Basically your predictions changed in the same rate and time as Fury's.
And don't act like you were sure Fury would beat him, I offered you a real money bet and you chickened out saying I'd stalk you after I've won
I spent hours and hours arguing with people about Fury-Klitschko in the master thread. Yes I'm a Fury fan, but i gave solid analysis as to why i thought Fury would win. Stop telling fibs, you were involved in that thread, you know very well that it wasn't a fanboy prediction. Ask Scott-Weiland or any of the other thread regulars and they'll tell you the same.
As for the bet, you should be grateful that i don't bet with online strangers, otherwise you'd be broke.
I spent hours and hours arguing with people about Fury-Klitschko in the master thread. Yes I'm a Fury fan, but i gave solid analysis as to why i thought Fury would win. Stop telling fibs, you were involved in that thread, you know very well that it wasn't a fanboy prediction. Ask Scott-Weiland or any of the other thread regulars and they'll tell you the same.
As for the bet, you should be grateful that i don't bet with online strangers, otherwise you'd be broke.
Yes people get predictions wrong, but you constantly get them wrong. Have you ever correctly picked a fight?
You get emotional all the time on here lol, some of your butthurt posts in the Thunderdome are hilarious.
Yes, Brook's win over Porter is better than anything Khan has achieved in his career thus far. Name me a better win?
I don't need to ask Scott I have the master thread and I know what I read. Yes it was a fanboy prediction that happened to be right, most of the time in that thread you were trolling and arguing about some random shit that had nothing to do with the fight.
You declining the bet just proves how insecure you were about the outcome.
And since that fight I've seen you say Fury beats basically everyone, even some past greats, you argued about it with Ray Corso the other day
Thunderdome is for setting beefs and that's what I do in there, you, on the other hand, start overflowing with estrogen whenever somebody says something negative about Fury on NSB...
Talk about being deulsional and emotional..
Khan's win over a proven fighter like Maidana is much better than Porter. What
has Shawn ever shown to suggest he's some great fighter? Just because he knocked out a past past prime Paulie and beat Maidana's son Broner doesn't mean he's a top WW. He's very overhyped on this forum for some reason.
Khan is much more accomplished fighter than Brook, anybody who says otherwise has an agenda or just DSKAB.
Comment