Comments Thread For: Hearn: Between 60/40 and 70/30 That Khan-Brook is Made For 6/4

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • LacedUp
    Still Smokin'
    Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
    • Oct 2009
    • 29171
    • 781
    • 381
    • 132,163

    #41

    Comment

    • M Bison
      Perfect, but you're not
      Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
      • Mar 2012
      • 15677
      • 600
      • 798
      • 32,424

      #42
      Originally posted by thack
      Yes Frankie is but he's got some fierce competition with Flatline , Box office,Lou and a couple more undesirables. At least their fighting for top position unlike their hero of course.
      Thack: Collazo KO's Khan
      (after the fight)
      Thack: Collazo a bum, he done now doe

      Thack: Omg he is fighting thee Devon Alexander the guy not even Brook would fight?
      Khan is going to get took to school, Devon whoops him probably KO's him too!
      (after the fight)
      Thack: .... Devon is done now, **** that guy he was always crap Brook would have beat him easier

      Thack: Oh Algieri, easy one for my man Chris he will KO Khan with EAAASEEE!
      (after the fight)
      Thack: That one punch that Algieri landed doe, so close to KO Khan but he now a bum doe!

      (the future)
      Thack: Kell Brook easily KO's this Amir Khan hehe
      (After the fight)
      Thack: But that's not fair, Kell Brook was meant to win... It was meant to be... why... whyyyyyyyyyy oh yeah Kell Brook is now a bum doe

      Comment

      • Szef
        Face of Boxing
        Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
        • Feb 2012
        • 15016
        • 2,488
        • 1,555
        • 253,303

        #43
        Originally posted by denium
        There's far more money involved in Khan-Brook than Khan-Garcia.

        I expect Khan will go for DSG though, easier fight and less embarrassing for him if he loses.
        Yeah a proven champion who had already knocked Khan out once is an easier fight than Kell 'no names on my resume' Brook

        Comment

        • removed
          Undisputed Champion
          Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
          • Nov 2008
          • 21479
          • 4,005
          • 831
          • 164,542

          #44
          Originally posted by Szef
          Yeah a proven champion who had already knocked Khan out once is an easier fight than Kell 'no names on my resume' Brook
          Use your eyes. It's obvious to anyone who knows about boxing that Brook would **** either of them up. Too big, too strong.

          Resume means nothing, you of all people should know that by now.

          One chocolate brownie right and Khan's jaw gets sent into the stands.
          Last edited by removed; 01-29-2016, 07:17 AM.

          Comment

          • emre belozoglu
            Interim Champion
            • Jan 2015
            • 588
            • 20
            • 0
            • 6,780

            #45
            Originally posted by LacedUp
            He said that after.



            Don't be totally ridiculous. In what ways are any of those better wins than going to America to defeat a top ranked undefeated welterweight?



            Lol DSG would be better

            Plan C? It's called Plan "backed-into-a-corner". Everyone knows Khan is scared as hell and getting beaten for $10million is better than getting beaten for $2million
            Dirrell is a better fighter than porter

            Comment

            • Szef
              Face of Boxing
              Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
              • Feb 2012
              • 15016
              • 2,488
              • 1,555
              • 253,303

              #46
              Originally posted by denium
              Use your eyes. It's obvious to anyone who knows about boxing that Brook would **** either of them up. Too big, too strong.

              Resume means nothing, you of all people should know that by now.
              I'm using my eyes. Along with my brain. I suggest you do the same.

              Brook is unproven, isn't a counter puncher like Garcia and Khan isn't rough like Porter. Keeping Khan at the end of his jab won't work for Brook because Khan has a decent jab himself and is much faster.

              And lol at your Fury - Klitschko reference. I love how you've playing some kind of boxing guru on these boards ever since that fight

              Comment

              • hugh grant
                Undisputed Champion
                Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                • Apr 2006
                • 30425
                • 2,183
                • 889
                • 105,596

                #47
                Brook should give khan the lion share. After brook kos khan he can then get lion dshare in rematch.
                Brook needs to prove he don't want khan as a payday and really wants to beat him.

                Comment

                • removed
                  Undisputed Champion
                  Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                  • Nov 2008
                  • 21479
                  • 4,005
                  • 831
                  • 164,542

                  #48
                  Originally posted by Szef
                  I'm using my eyes. Along with my brain. I suggest you do the same.

                  Brook is unproven, isn't a counter puncher like Garcia and Khan isn't rough like Porter. Keeping Khan at the end of his jab won't work for Brook because Khan has a decent jab himself and is much faster.

                  And lol at your Fury - Klitschko reference. I love how you've playing some kind of boxing guru on these boards ever since that fight
                  I was one of the few people in the sport to recognise that Fury would beat Klitschko with ease. Your the guy who picked him to lose to Dereck Chisora ffs

                  I don't claim to be a boxing guru, but i can definitely judge and pick a fight better than you can.

                  FYI. Brook is "proven". His win over Porter is miles better win than anything Khan has achieved at the weight. Brook times Khan coming in and knocks him the **** out. In fact Brook is more of a technician than Khan is.

                  Comment

                  • LacedUp
                    Still Smokin'
                    Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                    • Oct 2009
                    • 29171
                    • 781
                    • 381
                    • 132,163

                    #49
                    Originally posted by emre belozoglu
                    Dirrell is a better fighter than porter
                    Yeah sure he is.

                    He certainly proved that in the fight before he faced Degale didn't he?

                    Comment

                    • LacedUp
                      Still Smokin'
                      Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                      • Oct 2009
                      • 29171
                      • 781
                      • 381
                      • 132,163

                      #50
                      Originally posted by denium
                      I was one of the few people in the sport to recognise that Fury would beat Klitschko with ease. Your the guy who picked him to lose to Dereck Chisora ffs

                      I don't claim to be a boxing guru, but i can definitely judge and pick a fight better than you can.

                      FYI. Brook is "proven". His win over Porter is miles better win than anything Khan has achieved at the weight. Brook times Khan coming in and knocks him the **** out. In fact Brook is more of a technician than Khan is.
                      That weight or any other weight.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      TOP