Comments Thread For: Arum: I'd Love To See a Mayweather-Pacquiao Rematch

[travestyny]

who's handwriting was that?

moretti?

the person who tallied those individual score on the final score card is not the same person who wrote the remark that says mayweather won unanimously?

if the one who tallies the individual score and the one who wrote the remarks mayweather won unanimously on the final score card was the judge how did he made that glaring mistake of making red corner won when that judge was perfectly aware Floyd was not on the red corner. he was watching him for 12 rounds for pete sake.

just to make it simple, who tallied the individual score on the final score card?

You have the nerve to still bring this up after I curb stomped your zombie a$$ on this issue repeatedly? Really?

The judges clearly decided in favor of Mayweather. Straight from one of the judge's mouths. Read the damn article. His commentary on the fight matches his score card exactly. You contradicted yourself a billion times on this topic, but you have no legs to stand on unless you believe the judges were bought off, but if they were bought off, why did everyone in boxing not named Holyfield agree with them? Please answer that.

http://www.courant.com/sports/hc-jacobs-column-boxing-0504-20150503-column.html

[Rath]

You have the nerve to still bring this up after I curb stomped your zombie a$$ on this issue repeatedly? Really?

The judges clearly decided in favor of Mayweather. Straight from one of the judge's mouths. Read the damn article. His commentary on the fight matches his score card exactly. You contradicted yourself a billion times on this topic, but you have no legs to stand on unless you believe the judges were bought off, but if they were bought off, why did everyone in boxing not named Holyfield agree with them? Please answer that.

http://www.courant.com/sports/hc-jac...03-column.html

find out who tallied the score on the final score card.

go back to the thread where we are discussing this matter and settle that there.

don't forget to provide a better evidence.

the one that you presented was a photocopy of a cheaply mimeographed printed form without signatories and NSAC Logo.

for i know its a fake form.

still kicking zombies eh?

[Trinidad_Fan]

That makes one of him.

[Reloaded]

You have the nerve to still bring this up after I curb stomped your zombie a$$ on this issue repeatedly? Really?

The judges clearly decided in favor of Mayweather. Straight from one of the judge's mouths. Read the damn article. His commentary on the fight matches his score card exactly. You contradicted yourself a billion times on this topic, but you have no legs to stand on unless you believe the judges were bought off, but if they were bought off, why did everyone in boxing not named Holyfield agree with them? Please answer that.

http://www.courant.com/sports/hc-jac...03-column.html

Rath is like an inbred Donkey a mutant that doesnt retain anything , something really wrong up top with him .

[travestyny]

find out who tallied the score on the final score card.

go back to the thread where we are discussing this matter and settle that there.

don't forget to provide a better evidence.

the one that you presented was a photocopy of a cheaply mimeographed printed form without signatories and NSAC Logo.

for i know its a fake form.

still kicking zombies eh?

Why do you need to know who tallied the score when one of the judges himself is telling you whom he scored the fight for? He also said he is happy the judges got the decision right. What else do you need?

http://www.courant.com/sports/hc-jacobs-column-boxing-0504-20150503-column.html

[Rath]

Rath is like an inbred Donkey a mutant that doesnt retain anything , something really wrong up top with him .

oh here comes genius floyd fans gang of slow motioned brain posters.

upgrade your kindergarten insults.

it does not work.

[travestyny]

Rath is like an inbred Donkey a mutant that doesnt retain anything , something really wrong up top with him .

Some might think his persistence is admirable, until you realize that he really is just incapable of comprehending anything.

[Rath]

Why do you need to know who tallied the score when one of the judges himself is telling you whom he scored the fight for? He also said he is happy the judges got the decision right. What else do you need?

http://www.courant.com/sports/hc-jac...03-column.html

why don't you want to know who made the mistake of writing mayweather won unanimously on the remark while making red corner won on the score?

[Rath]

Some might think his persistence is admirable, until you realize that he really is just incapable of comprehending anything.

you comprehension only works on things that favors your stand and stop working on those that does not.

but i can understand

that is why this:

genius floyd fans and their logic

[b00g13man]

You have the nerve to still bring this up after I curb stomped your zombie a$$ on this issue repeatedly? Really?

The judges clearly decided in favor of Mayweather. Straight from one of the judge's mouths. Read the damn article. His commentary on the fight matches his score card exactly. You contradicted yourself a billion times on this topic, but you have no legs to stand on unless you believe the judges were bought off, but if they were bought off, why did everyone in boxing not named Holyfield agree with them? Please answer that.

http://www.courant.com/sports/hc-jac...03-column.html

What's funny is the obvious contradiction with both of his conspiracy theories. Going by those, Floyd actually won rounds 4 and 6, which were the most obvious ones to give to Manny.

He's so desperate, he can't even see that.