Comments Thread For: Arum: I'd Love To See a Mayweather-Pacquiao Rematch

[Rath]

What's funny is the obvious contradiction with both of his conspiracy theories. Going by those, Floyd actually won rounds 4 and 6, which were the most obvious ones to give to Manny.

He's so desperate, he can't even see that.

three stooges genius floyd fans complete.

boogerman

unleaded

transvestitenies

[travestyny]

why don't you want to know who made the mistake of writing mayweather won unanimously on the remark while making red corner won on the score?

Writing Mayweather won unanimously was not the mistake. The judges scored it for Mayweather. It is clear if you read the article.

So you are complaining about a scorecard that has the correct winner on it. It's very simple. Accept that you are wrong and find another angle to attack from.

Just go along with the whole "I think compubox is as good as **** for scoring boxing matches, but when it isn't, it is orchestrated by a Pacroach in slow moe" scenario. I mean it's an equally idiotic perception since compubox isn't used to judge a boxing match in the first place, but at least it is merely based on opinion.

[The Big Dunn]

What's funny is the obvious contradiction with both of his conspiracy theories. Going by those, Floyd actually won rounds 4 and 6, which were the most obvious ones to give to Manny.

He's so desperate, he can't even see that.

At this point, Rath should be treated like people that think the earth is flat or like a child that thinks Santa Claus is real.

The site benefits because numerous visitors click these threads just to see how silly guys like him, spoon23, and the rest are, same way the clicked on Junior Gong.

[Rath]

Writing Mayweather won unanimously was not the mistake. The judges scored it for Mayweather. It is clear if you read the article.

So you are complaining about a scorecard that has the correct winner on it. It's very simple. Accept that you are wrong and find another angle to attack from.

Just go along with the whole "I think compubox is as good as **** for scoring boxing matches, but when it isn't, it is orchestrated by a Pacroach in slow moe" scenario. I mean it's an equally idiotic perception since compubox isn't used to judge a boxing match in the first place, but at least it is merely based on opinion.

why is it so hard for you to understand that the final score catd shows conflicting results?

oh, because the one that was announced was the one that favors you right.

so the other result just have to be ignored.

genius floyd fan and his logic.

[Rath]

At this point, Rath should be treated like people that think the earth is flat or like a child that thinks Santa Claus is real.

The site benefits because numerous visitors click these threads just to see how silly guys like him, spoon23, and the rest are, same way the clicked on Junior Gong.

this post should not be taken seriously coz it is false.

this poster is a known yusaf mack and floyd supporter

he has vested interest.

therefore he is not credible.

big dunn's logic

the ganging up technique of genius floyd fans in full display

showing their propensity to use kindergarten insult if their genius logic fails


SHAME ON YOU

[travestyny]

why is it so hard for you to understand that the final score catd shows conflicting results?

oh, because the one that was announced was the one that favors you right.

so the other result just have to be ignored.

genius floyd fan and his logic.

If the scorecard shows conflicting results, it should be cleared up.

Who can clear up the mistake?

The judges can, don't you agree? There is no reason to keep going over this with you. The truth is there, but you refuse to see it. It's really a shame that the truth hurts you this much.

http://www.courant.com/sports/hc-jacobs-column-boxing-0504-20150503-column.html

[Rath]

If the scorecard shows conflicting results, it should be cleared up.

Who can clear up the mistake?

The judges can, don't you agree? There is no reason to keep going over this with you. The truth is there, but you refuse to see it. It's really a shame that the truth hurts you this much.

http://www.courant.com/sports/hc-jac...03-column.html

there was only one judge who stood up according to you.

how is that called judges?

again

provide me with an original copy of the final score card

one with NSAC Logo and signatories on the form.

not the cheap photocopy of a mimeographed printed questionable form
that looks fake from all angles.

[Trinidad_Fan]

Things I'd like to see:

1. My name on a Powerball check.
2. A mud wrestling match between J-Lo and Kim Kardashian.
.
.
.
1,000,000. A dog taking a dump on the street.
1,000,001. A rematch between Floyd and Pacquiao.

[travestyny]

there was only one judge who stood up according to you.

how is that called judges?

again

provide me with an original copy of the final score card

one with NSAC Logo and signatories on the form.

not the cheap photocopy of a mimeographed printed questionable form
that looks fake from all angles.

The scorecard shows that all of the judges voted the same way. If you don't believe that the scorecard is authentic, then your conspiracy theory dies right there anyway and all you are left with is the only thing there is anyway....Unanimous Decision - Mayweather.

You were proven wrong, and now you try to ditch the whole thing all together.



I'm done.

[Rath]

The scorecard shows that all of the judges voted the same way. If you don't believe that the scorecard is authentic, then your conspiracy theory dies right there anyway and all you are left with is the only thing there is anyway....Unanimous Decision - Mayweather.

You were proven wrong, and now you try to ditch the whole thing all together.



I'm done.

think about this for a second.

there were 36 individual score cards, 12 for each judge.

the person who tallied it never realizes he was tallying it for the wrong corner (which is red corner) 36 times?

your stand is weak

provide an authentic NSAC final core card form

it does not have to be Floyd vs Pac's score card form (any fight will do)just so we could have something to compare your evidence with.

does that sounds fair and logical to you?

keep that meme i might be using that later lol