Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Comments Thread For: Matt Korobov Ready To Face Gennady Golovkin on April 23

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #81
    He certainly fits the profile.

    Comment


    • #82
      Originally posted by Chollo Vista View Post
      I provided a counter argument to this the other day and you were mute.

      Again, how can you say Lemieux won a REAL world title when all 3 of Lemieux's best opponents, including N'dam, were against people Quillin already beat? The same Quillin Jacobs stopped in 85 seonds.

      Lemiuex won a VACANT title, while Quillin actually defended his title. Again, all of Lemieux's best wins were against opponents Quillin already defeated, yet you still find a way to discredit Jacobs. That's not even mentioning the fact that Lemieux lost twice to C Level opponents; one by KO.

      Please explain how that works?
      I didn't respomd to your other comment because it wasn't worthy of a response.

      Lemieux didn't win a world title because it was vacant when he fought for it?

      Ok.

      I'm only responding to this to say I'm not discrediting Jacobs. But he is NOT the WBA MW champ. Golovkin is.

      Jacobs is not an actual world title holder, and I don't agree that beating Quillin makes him the bogy man of the MW division.

      Comment


      • #83
        Originally posted by Dip_Slide View Post
        Quillin had a draw with Lee in a fight I thought he won and more importantly, he knocked down Hassan N'Dam 6 times in their fight when N'dam was undefeated, the same guy u claim Lemieux won a "real" world title against where in fact it was a vacant title. Jacobs beat an ok fighter to win the title but he has a victory over an undefeated top guy in Quillin, something GGG himself doesn't have.

        U wanna talk about facing world class fighters? how can u down a Jacobs opponent for not facing any world class fighters, when GGG himself never did?!

        Jacobs or Lara would be the best most credible opponents for GGG right now by a 100 miles because they're fighters who proved themselves and showed that they belong to the elite fighters at or around that weight as of right now, Korobov was a promising prospect before he got stopped by Leeand had injuries, we have no idea where Korobov is at now because he still didn't come back from all that and he never beat a C+ level fighter in his whole career.
        You muppets are hilarious!

        Comment


        • #84
          Originally posted by kafkod View Post
          You muppets are hilarious!
          And you've lost that debate badly.

          Comment


          • #85
            Originally posted by kafkod View Post
            I didn't respomd to your other comment because it wasn't worthy of a response.

            Lemieux didn't win a world title because it was vacant when he fought for it?

            Ok.

            I'm only responding to this to say I'm not discrediting Jacobs. But he is NOT the WBA MW champ. Golovkin is.

            Jacobs is not an actual world title holder, and I don't agree that beating Quillin makes him the bogy man of the MW division.
            and if Im not mistaken, Jacobs fought Jarrod Fletcher for the VACANT regular title......

            Comment


            • #86
              Originally posted by OnePunch View Post
              and if Im not mistaken, Jacobs fought Jarrod Fletcher for the VACANT regular title......
              But the difference is Jacobs defended his title and has the top victory in the division.
              Last edited by Chollo Vista; 01-23-2016, 10:18 AM.

              Comment


              • #87
                Originally posted by Chuckguy View Post
                Ha lmfao ridiculous post. In that case why should any undefeated fighter fight someone with a loss on their record since they are obviously fighting someone's left overs.
                No, the point was is that kafkod was giving Lemieux more credit for being better than Quillin when in actuality not only does he have two losses to C Class fighters, but all of his best 3 wins are against fighters Quillin already beat.

                Kafkod's counter argument to that is "Da vacant title doe"
                Last edited by Chollo Vista; 01-23-2016, 10:18 AM.

                Comment


                • #88
                  Originally posted by Mike Haynes View Post
                  I don't see the problem here....unless Andy Lee ruined him, I'm pretty sure Korobov beats Canelo, Quillen, Saunders and (maybe) Jacobs at 160.
                  No. No he doesn't. Tf is wrong with u dudes.

                  Comment


                  • #89
                    Originally posted by kafkod View Post
                    I didn't respomd to your other comment because it wasn't worthy of a response.

                    Lemieux didn't win a world title because it was vacant when he fought for it?

                    Ok.

                    I'm only responding to this to say I'm not discrediting Jacobs. But he is NOT the WBA MW champ. Golovkin is.

                    Jacobs is not an actual world title holder, and I don't agree that beating Quillin makes him the bogy man of the MW division.
                    So you'd rather acknowledge Lemiuex's paper title over Jacobs hard earned defense of his title against Quillin without acknowledging the logistics in that Quillin was the much better more proven fighter?

                    This is how boxrec rumors get started.
                    Last edited by Chollo Vista; 01-23-2016, 01:20 PM.

                    Comment


                    • #90
                      You mean to tell me we are getting Golovkin vs Korobov...THIS YEAR?!?!? Omg... HBO you are
                      the best!!!!!!


                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X
                      TOP