Worst Boxing Org/Sanctioning Body of 2015?

[original zero]

Aaah right, so Fury did not have an alternative course of action ?

Aight then, STFU

Once he signed the rematch clause, he no longer had an alternative course of action. I've never denied that. There are two issues though.

#1 - The IBF didn't have an alternative course of action either, which you continue to refuse to acknowledge in the face of overwhelming evidence to the contrary.

#2 - You were 100% incorrect when you wrote the following:

"Genius, if Fury had not contractually agreed to a rematch, he wouldn't have got the fight, you do know that right?"

That is false. Fury was a mandatory challenge and would have gotten the fight with or without a rematch clause. You are 100% wrong. Will you admit the mistake or will you continue to duck & dodge like you always do?

[LoadedWraps]

rules doe, why won't you tell us an alternative course of action that would have enabled Fury to fight that bum Glazkov..... without being sued for breech of contract by K2 Promotions?

You do know that Klitschko was the IBF champ right, not Fury ?

Right ?

Genius, if Fury had not contractually agreed to a rematch, he wouldn't have got the fight, you do know that right?

OBVIOUSLY, the organisation who happened to be INCORRECT are the asshat's who needed to manage their affairs more professionally.

If they had correct business practices, they could have managed that situation a lot more professionally with some good old fashioned communication.

Their bum was mandated to KLITSCHKO, and when Fury beat Klitschko the boxing landscape completely changed.

Boxing organisations have a responsibility to be current, and to be accurate.

The fact that they stripped the best heavyweight on the planet, and lineal champ, for a guy who should not be ranked in the top 10..... is on them.

Keywords = obviously, incorrect.

You support ******ity, and I do not.

Gratz to you and Martin.

Exactly. It's a foolish move from a business perspective, and they lose credibility with the fans and fight teams. Fury had the title for a week. are you kidding me? Who is the champion and for how long matters.

[original zero]

loaded wraps, do you deny that main events would have taken the ibf to court if the ibf didnt strip fury?

[ianjamsie]

How about WBC allowing their fighters to pick super weak defences if they have a high profile.

Or IBF forcing fighters into mandatory contests with fighters who just aren't good enough.

[original zero]

Just so nobody is confused by AboutTime's lies, Tyson Fury was the WBO mandatory challenger, which meant he was under no obligation to agree to a rematch clause and was guaranteed a title shot with or without a rematch clause.

So when AboutTime writes that Tyson Fury wouldn't have gotten a title shot without a rematch clause, he is 100% wrong. People should have whatever opinion they want, but facts are facts. About Time thinks he is entitled to his own facts. So time and time again he writes absolute falsehoods and never apologizes when outed as a liar. This is just the latest example.

[aboutfkntime]

Just so nobody is confused by AboutTime's lies, Tyson Fury was the WBO mandatory challenger, which meant he was under no obligation to agree to a rematch clause and was guaranteed a title shot with or without a rematch clause.

So when AboutTime writes that Tyson Fury wouldn't have gotten a title shot without a rematch clause, he is 100% wrong. People should have whatever opinion they want, but facts are facts. About Time thinks he is entitled to his own facts. So time and time again he writes absolute falsehoods and never apologizes when outed as a liar. This is just the latest example.

Kid, Klitschko would not have fought Fury without a rematch clause.

I simply do not believe that......

I don't care what the IBF say, and I don't think Klitschko does either.

Klitschko is an adult human being, not some silly kid

* You are a ***wit for supporting Fury being stripped
* You are a ***wit for not questioning the absurd IBF rankings
* You are a ***wit for supporting Martin as champ

#rulesdoe

[original zero]

Tyson Fury was the WBO & WBA mandatory. Wladimir Klitschko would have been stripped of both of those belts if he refused to face Tyson Fury.

What have you seen from Wladimir's career that indicates to you that he would have vacated two of his titles rather than face his mandatory?

No amount of childish insults is going to change the facts and the facts don't support your premise.

And lying about my positions isn't going to help you either. I'm not supporting anything, I'm plainly stating, as fact, that the IBF had no choice but to strip Tyson Fury because Glazkov's rights were unequivocal and Main Events would have easily gained a court injunction.

I know you don't like rules and I know you don't like facts. All I can do is explain to you how the world works. If you prefer to live a fantasy, I hope you enjoy.

[aboutfkntime]

Tyson Fury was the WBO & WBA mandatory. Wladimir Klitschko would have been stripped of both of those belts if he refused to face Tyson Fury.

What have you seen from Wladimir's career that indicates to you that he would have vacated two of his titles rather than face his mandatory?

No amount of childish insults is going to change the facts and the facts don't support your premise.

And lying about my positions isn't going to help you either. I'm not supporting anything, I'm plainly stating, as fact, that the IBF had no choice but to strip Tyson Fury because Glazkov's rights were unequivocal and Main Events would have easily gained a court injunction.

I know you don't like rules and I know you don't like facts. All I can do is explain to you how the world works. If you prefer to live a fantasy, I hope you enjoy.

nothing has changed..........

* I value common-sense..... and you do not.

* You value " rules doe ", even if they are silly..... and I do not.

* the IBF proved that they are a second-rate organisation with a second-rate champion, when they stripped the-man-who-beat-the-man Fury in favor of a guy who is not much more than an untested prospect.

[original zero]

correct. nothing has changed. you were lying before and you're lying now.

fury was the mandatory and guaranteed the fight without a rematch clause. you claimed otherwise. you were wrong. no amount of whining changes that.

[ianjamsie]

The awarding bodies all clash.

When a fighter has been number 1 for as long a Wlad is of course he will have a rematch clause.

These belts don't determine contractual requirements.