Worst Boxing Org/Sanctioning Body of 2015?

[aboutfkntime]

Please explain how the IBF could have sanctioned Fury-Klitschko II without getting their ass handed to them in court by Main Events.

I'll wait.

1) You missed the point kid, they should never have mandated Glazkov.

2) Their " rules doe " should be sufficient/adequate enough to enable them to make the best decision for boxing.

They are as ****** as The Ring for anally following flawed methodology.

And you are just as ****** for supporting that mess.

It is obviously wrong, and clearly not in the best interests of the sport..... but what the hell, it's in the rules so lets do it anyway

So yea, my answer is, that was some real DUMB **** right there.

[original zero]

So after 19 pages you finally admit that the IBF had no choice but to strip Tyson Fury?

[aboutfkntime]

So after 19 pages you finally admit that the IBF had no choice but to strip Tyson Fury?

Oh, is that what I said ?

1) You missed the point kid, they should never have mandated Glazkov.

2) Their " rules doe " should be sufficient/adequate enough to enable them to make the best decision for boxing.

They are as ****** as The Ring for anally following flawed methodology.

And you are just as ****** for supporting that mess.

It is obviously wrong, and clearly not in the best interests of the sport..... but what the hell, it's in the rules so lets do it anyway

So yea, my answer is, that was some real DUMB **** right there.

The bold..... is why you need to take a long hard look at yourself, and why I have very little faith in humanity. You are not an intelligent human being.

[original zero]

So then tell us an alternative course of action for the IBF that would have held up in court.

You can't.

You can try to insult my level of intelligence all that you want, but my intellectual credentials speak for themselves. I started college at the age of 11, have an IQ of 155, I'm a member of MENSA, I own several successful businesses, etc.

But since my logical arguments frustrate you, you continue to lash out.

19 pages in though and you haven't told us how the IBF could have managed to sanction Klitschko-Fury II without losing in court.

Which means they had no choice but to strip Fury.

You don't like it and you don't have to. Nobody cares what you like. Nobody cares what you care about. Nobody cares if you don't like rules. Judges like rules and therefore the IBF had no choice.

[aboutfkntime]

So then tell us an alternative course of action for the IBF that would have held up in court.

You can't.

You can try to insult my level of intelligence all that you want, but my intellectual credentials speak for themselves. I started college at the age of 11, have an IQ of 155, I'm a member of MENSA, I own several successful businesses, etc.

But since my logical arguments frustrate you, you continue to lash out.

19 pages in though and you haven't told us how the IBF could have managed to sanction Klitschko-Fury II without losing in court.

Which means they had no choice but to strip Fury.

You don't like it and you don't have to. Nobody cares what you like. Nobody cares what you care about. Nobody cares if you don't like rules. Judges like rules and therefore the IBF had no choice.

More, blah blah blah..... so, you consider yourself a genius, and I consider you a dumb cvnt..... lets just leave it there.

It is obviously wrong, and clearly not in the best interests of the sport..... but what the hell, it's in the rules so lets do it anyway

BTW kid, just a question, is Manny Pacquiao your favorite fighter ?

[JAB5239]

They're all horrible.

[original zero]

Aboutfkntime, why do you refuse to tell us an alternative course of action for the IBF that would have held up in court?

[aboutfkntime]

Aboutfkntime, why do you refuse to tell us an alternative course of action for the IBF that would have held up in court?

rules doe, why do you refuse to tell us an alternative course of action to enable Fury to fight that bum Glazkov..... without being sued for breech of contract by K2 Promotions?

And rules doe, why do you still refuse to use some common-sense ?

Let's just run through this 1 more time.....

The IBF stripped the best heavyweight on the planet. and lineal champion..... knowing that he simply cannot defend against Glazkov, an undeserving bum, because of contractual obligations with the 2nd best heavyweight on the planet.....

..... and as a result of that ******ity, the IBF have now ended up with an undeserving/untested prospect ranked as champion..... who will likely soon be beaten by an undeserving/untested contender.

Fury should beat Joshua and then dump that joke IBF clown-belt in the bin.

You are an asshat kid.

[aboutfkntime]

rules doe, you absolutely reek of something, so I gotta ask.....

..... is Manny Pacquiao your favorite fighter ?

[l9uis]

The IBF rankings are horrible. With the red and gold crown...its by far the best looking belt. but how on earth is this organisation happy to mandate some of these fighters?

While Joshua ideally isn't ready to be world champ, the fact that some of his mandatory defences will be against some very poor opposition makes up for this. Enabling him to still learn on the job while having a world title around his waist.

Eddie Hearn seems to have spotted this.

Kell Brook has the IBF and his mandatries were JoJo Dan and Kevin Bizier (can't wait for Errol Spence to actually be in line next).

IBF Super Middleweight Champ James Degale is fighting a guy next who I have never heard of.

And looking at the IBF heavyweight rankings, its a who's-who of bums. Aside from Joseph Parker, who I think can be a genuine contender.

How can the bosses at IBF be happy to actually have these fighters representing their belts?

If I was head of IBF I would be corrupt as fxck if those people were in line for my belt next lol.

Being champ was meant to mean the best fighting the best. From the defences of Brook to Degale to Martin... The IBF are not holding themselves very high in this respect.