I would, I think GGG should take the fight. He'd be the best fighter GGG has ever faced and I think GGG stops him. Winnable fight over a more than solid opponent, weight or not. I have no clue as to why K2 hasnt jumped on this. Lara could move up to 160 and wax GGG's entire resume. So would Andrade and possibly even Trout himself, strong possibilty. Yet I think GGG beats all 3, I would just like to see him do it. These "Top 10 Ranked MW" opponents he's been facing have been pure trash from a boxing skill set stand point, you know this. Guys at 54 would look way better on his resume as opposed to bums like Geale, Lemiux, Ishida, Stevens. Those guys would be lunch for most top 154 pounders.
Comments Thread For: Trout: Lara Has Been Calling Out Golovkin For a Year Now!
Collapse
-
-
Comment
-
My point exactly, keep it funky the majority of the better fighters on this list are at 54Too many divisions and too much divide in boxing. Imagine a world where 154 didn't exist and there was no beefs. You would have a division that looked like this:
1. Golovkin
2. Canelo
3. Lara
4. Jacobs
5. Trout
6. Cotto
7. Andrade
8. Billy Hoe
9. Mell Charlo
10. Mall Charlo
11. Vanes
12. Liam Smith
13. J Rock
14. Lemieux
15. Lee
Anyone who cleaned out THAT division would be an immediate HOF'r.Comment
-
Well Johnson has to be fought regardless. As for Lara, all I can do is LOL at him being elite. There are no "Elite" fighters in this sport right now. The tank is dry.Last edited by deanrw; 01-15-2016, 01:38 PM.Comment
-
Good find, some of these folks don't want to hear the truth that Lara's never actually tried to contact Golovkin for a fight, just uses his name to hype up his fights against retired WW's.Comment
-
Comment
-
No point in calling out a fighter across the street, you know the fight can't happen. No point of even entertaining it. Hell Kov vs Stevenson couldn't happen and it was made a mandatory. There isn't a single possible fight that could happen between the two unless they happen on HBO and SHO nor PBC will allow for that.Comment
Comment