Roach: Crawford rejected Pacquiao fight
Collapse
-
Comment
-
thats what i thought too.. but reading this article (if u even read it) it seems like arum still have other plans for manny judging by freddie's comments. not sure what passing the torch has anything to do with this as i never said that???Comment
-
Pacquiao ain't pummeled **** in years.
Yall need to let the past go. Pacquiao is a great fighter that is past it.
No way he would have destroyed bud.
Pacquiao isn't gonna even pummel bradleyComment
-
Crawford's best win is a blown up featherweight Yurorkis Gamboa, Gamboa had his moments wobbling Crawford multiple times in that fight. Believe me when I tell you that Crawford is not ready for Pacquiao.Comment
-
As I posted in the other thread here:
Arum, Koncz and Manny claim they chose Bradley. Which implies that there was a choice at least between Bradley and someone else.
As I posted in this thread:
Roach and even Arum said that Khan wasn't even in the plan. Which only leaves Crawford.
If Crawford wasn't interested then why so long to announce Bradley?Comment
-
Crawford is a smart man, he realises that earning good money against low level opponents while Pacquiao fades further is the way to go.
Not the ballsy move of a great fighter which is lacking in American boxing but it will probably earn him a bigger payday later against a weaker Pacquiao.Comment
-
Crawford will UD pacquiao when they fight.
And it will probably be later this year because pacquiao isn't guaranteed to win the electionLast edited by bluebeam; 01-16-2016, 03:38 PM.Comment
-
I doubt this is true. I mean a young lion like Crawford wouldn't want to fight an aging superstar like Manny?? Seems fishy to me. At this point in Manny's career, its not like Crawford wouldn't stand a chance...Comment
Comment