Comments Thread For: Garcia-Guerrero Rejected By WBA For Vacant "Super" Title

[285Kid]

So this is a WBA eliminator now? Wasn't this part of the WBC tournament?

[Chrismart]

Haha well, nice try PBC but a good call in this case. The winner being WBA Superchamp would of been a joke, as was the Mares Vs Santa Cruz winner.. (as is the very notion of having 2 champs).

[Dean_Razorback]

lol, haymon wanted to snatch another "super belt" like he did with mares/santa cruz

[Hougigo]

LOL at them wanting to limit the champions to 2... but I guarantee if Floyd wasn't still their champion, they'd do this in a heart beat like they did for Mares/LSC

[Eastcoast]

It was BS that Cruz was able to leapfrog Cuellar for the WBA Super title, same here with Garcia/Guerrero trying to leapfrog Thurman. There's no accountability for WBA when they allow these things to happen, thankfully they finally made a correct decision.


If I was a legit champion with their belt I'd sue them them for diluting the value of my title by allowing other guys to claim their also the WBA champ.

[Fetta]

Good! A "super" champion on top of regular on top of interim yeah belts are irrelevant

[tredh]

Have no problem with this at all

[bigjavi973]

Good stuff.... I don't see how anyone can complain about this decision.... hopefully what it says about the two champs per division thing is true (just the champion & interim champ only no super, or super duper stuff)

[Boxfan83]

The WBA is full of ****, I bet come fight week they will open up the "Interim" Super WW title.

[Teetotaler]

Good call. Why the fu ck would the winner of this weakass matchup be the wba "super" champion?