Comments Thread For: Wilder: Fury is a Tall Guy With No Power, I Won't Need Judges!

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Drunken Cat
    Undisputed Champion
    Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
    • Sep 2003
    • 14547
    • 916
    • 1,272
    • 30,630

    #81
    Originally posted by fredhopple
    nobody cares about a thrown fight as most of the money was bet on Wlad to win the fight and the books cleaned up in the betting. Boxing has been fixing fights for decades and thrown fights happen all the time. It's not a crime to throw a fight and lose on purpose. DUH? Do you live under a rock or in a cave? Or just a clueless Brit?
    Actually there was big money bet on Fury. The odds started very wide, and continuously tightened up in the weeks and months before the fight, due to all the money being placed on Fury.

    Comment

    • fredhopple
      Undisputed Champion
      Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
      • Jan 2013
      • 1520
      • 90
      • 0
      • 7,791

      #82
      Originally posted by Virgil Caine
      Actually there was big money bet on Fury. The odds started very wide, and continuously tightened up in the weeks and months before the fight, due to all the money being placed on Fury.
      Lots of UK fans and the Irish believed in Fury enough to bet the big lug. Fury has little talent and is a terrible fighter. Watch how this all plays out.

      Comment

      • Drunken Cat
        Undisputed Champion
        Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
        • Sep 2003
        • 14547
        • 916
        • 1,272
        • 30,630

        #83
        Originally posted by fredhopple
        Lots of UK fans and the Irish believed in Fury enough to bet the big lug. Fury has little talent and is a terrible fighter. Watch how this all plays out.
        Changing the topic now?

        You said that most of the money was bet on Wlad., in the context of your ridiculous conspiracy theory that Wlad. threw the fight.

        I pointed out how wrong you are.

        Comment

        • fredhopple
          Undisputed Champion
          Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
          • Jan 2013
          • 1520
          • 90
          • 0
          • 7,791

          #84
          Originally posted by Virgil Caine
          Changing the topic now?

          You said that most of the money was bet on Wlad., in the context of your ridiculous conspiracy theory that Wlad. threw the fight.

          I pointed out how wrong you are.
          Son, $100 bet on Fury returned almost $500 back. The world wide casinos Hong Kong and Macau and even Monte Carlo had huge bets on Fury placed which some seem to think Wlad threw the fight and made a fortune. Fury is a OAF a creme filled soft pastry cake filled with Goo.

          Comment

          • removed
            Undisputed Champion
            Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
            • Nov 2008
            • 21479
            • 4,005
            • 831
            • 164,542

            #85
            Originally posted by fredhopple
            Son, $100 bet on Fury returned almost $500 back. The world wide casinos Hong Kong and Macau and even Monte Carlo had huge bets on Fury placed which some seem to think Wlad threw the fight and made a fortune. Fury is a OAF a creme filled soft pastry cake filled with Goo.
            Still butthurt

            Fury is the baddest man on the planet, the heavyweight champion of the world, the don, the boss, your daddy.

            Comment

            • Drunken Cat
              Undisputed Champion
              Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
              • Sep 2003
              • 14547
              • 916
              • 1,272
              • 30,630

              #86
              Originally posted by fredhopple
              Son, $100 bet on Fury returned almost $500 back. The world wide casinos Hong Kong and Macau and even Monte Carlo had huge bets on Fury placed which some seem to think Wlad threw the fight and made a fortune. Fury is a OAF a creme filled soft pastry cake filled with Goo.
              People who think that are idiots.

              Also, you stated something which was flat wrong and now won't admit it.

              You said most of the money was on Wlad, which is patently untrue, as evidenced by how much the odds continuously got tighter and tighter before the fight. They started out very wide. By fight time, they were like 1/4.

              Comment

              • fredhopple
                Undisputed Champion
                Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
                • Jan 2013
                • 1520
                • 90
                • 0
                • 7,791

                #87
                Originally posted by Virgil Caine
                People who think that are idiots.

                Also, you stated something which was flat wrong and now won't admit it.

                You said most of the money was on Wlad, which is patently untrue, as evidenced by how much the odds continuously got tighter and tighter before the fight. They started out very wide. By fight time, they were like 1/4.
                Like I stated $100 bet on Fury returned almost $500. Probably in the UK there might have been closer odds. Wlad threw the fight and cleaned up huge. Boxing is a croooked sport so easy to fix a fight especially when the champ sells out for millions. Fury is a soft joke and an OAF.

                Comment

                • Drunken Cat
                  Undisputed Champion
                  Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
                  • Sep 2003
                  • 14547
                  • 916
                  • 1,272
                  • 30,630

                  #88
                  Originally posted by fredhopple
                  Like I stated $100 bet on Fury returned almost $500. Probably in the UK there might have been closer odds. Wlad threw the fight and cleaned up huge. Boxing is a croooked sport so easy to fix a fight especially when the champ sells out for millions. Fury is a soft joke and an OAF.
                  I followed the odds, they were much wider at first, and constantly tightened up. By fight time, they were about 1/4.

                  You haven't done anything except have it explained to you that you were wrong.

                  Comment

                  • fredhopple
                    Undisputed Champion
                    Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
                    • Jan 2013
                    • 1520
                    • 90
                    • 0
                    • 7,791

                    #89
                    Originally posted by Virgil Caine
                    I followed the odds, they were much wider at first, and constantly tightened up. By fight time, they were about 1/4.

                    You haven't done anything except have it explained to you that you were wrong.
                    Son I bet $10,000 on Wlad to win the fight in Vegas.
                    With less than 24 hours until fight time, let's take a look at the pre-fight odds. Here are the Klitschko vs. Fury odds, courtesy of Odds Shark:

                    Wladimir Klitschko -500
                    Tyson Fury +435

                    So if you want to win money on Klitschko, you need to bet $500 to bring yourself $100. On the other side, a $100 bet on Fury will bring you $435.

                    Those are definitely wide odds in favor of Klitschko, but they are closer than the champ typically sees.
                    I would have won only $2000 which I thought was a sure thing. Word has it that Wlad threw the fight and collected huge cash off his loss. It happens as boxing is a crooked sport and so easy to fix a fight. Wlad threw 6 punches a round and looked terrible in throwing the Fury fight. Not sure where you bet Boy but maybe in the UK the odds were different. Not happy about losing the 10G but that is boxing.

                    Comment

                    • Drunken Cat
                      Undisputed Champion
                      Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
                      • Sep 2003
                      • 14547
                      • 916
                      • 1,272
                      • 30,630

                      #90
                      Originally posted by fredhopple
                      Son I bet $10,000 on Wlad to win the fight in Vegas.
                      With less than 24 hours until fight time, let's take a look at the pre-fight odds. Here are the Klitschko vs. Fury odds, courtesy of Odds Shark:

                      Wladimir Klitschko -500
                      Tyson Fury +435

                      So if you want to win money on Klitschko, you need to bet $500 to bring yourself $100. On the other side, a $100 bet on Fury will bring you $435.

                      Those are definitely wide odds in favor of Klitschko, but they are closer than the champ typically sees.
                      I would have won only $2000 which I thought was a sure thing. Word has it that Wlad threw the fight and collected huge cash off his loss. It happens as boxing is a crooked sport and so easy to fix a fight. Wlad threw 6 punches a round and looked terrible in throwing the Fury fight. Not sure where you bet Boy but maybe in the UK the odds were different. Not happy about losing the 10G but that is boxing.
                      Fag, I understand how odds work. And I doubt you bet $10,000 on the fight.

                      The first time I checked the odds a couple months out they were 1/14. When I checked them right before the fight, they were 1/4.

                      The entire basis of this exchange, fag, is your false claim that most of the money was on Wlad., which is disproved by the odds movements.

                      There is a thing called, the internet, which allows you to check fight odds, without being in Vegas. I always follow the odds for big fights. It's an indicator, whether or not you bet on the fights in question.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      TOP