Serious question.
Give me one good reason why he isn't on there. He just beat one of the longest reigning HW champs in history, a man many had high in their P4P rankings prior to the fight, and made it look easy.
Ring's criteria for rating is primarily based on results, with performances second. Well Fury just had a mammoth result and a standout performance. Yet he's nowhere in sight.
I realise heavyweight bias is always going to play a factor in these sorts of lists, but when you beat the best in the division without controversy or unfair advantage (both men were around the same weight) then you deserve to be in with a shout.
I'm not surprised Fury himself thinks so lowly of the pound for pound concept. It's rife with inconsistencies and downright favouritism.
Give me one good reason why he isn't on there. He just beat one of the longest reigning HW champs in history, a man many had high in their P4P rankings prior to the fight, and made it look easy.
Ring's criteria for rating is primarily based on results, with performances second. Well Fury just had a mammoth result and a standout performance. Yet he's nowhere in sight.
I realise heavyweight bias is always going to play a factor in these sorts of lists, but when you beat the best in the division without controversy or unfair advantage (both men were around the same weight) then you deserve to be in with a shout.
I'm not surprised Fury himself thinks so lowly of the pound for pound concept. It's rife with inconsistencies and downright favouritism.
Comment