Most annoying father??

[Santa_]

Ruben takes the cake tho "THAT'S BOO-SHIT BEBAY!!"

[ShoulderRoll]

At least Floyd Sr and English Eubank accomplished something as boxers. They earned the right to be a little eccentric and annoying.

[The Big Dunn]

I had typed in a smart remark, but on 2nd thought its a pointless endeavor.

Since you and I will obviously NEVER have a sensible or respectful conversation, how about we just ignore each other from now on?

Deal?

Dude, this was a joke, relax. We have sensible conversations all the time. I just get the better of you in our debates and my jokes are a little funnier.

Its cool that you like GGG. you can't just wish away his hypocrisy, lack of quality opponents on his resume (I'm sure you heard what Max said this past Saturday if you watched HBO), and the fact he didn't win the title in the ring.

[OnePunch]

Dude, this was a joke, relax. We have sensible conversations all the time. I just get the better of you in our debates and my jokes are a little funnier.

Its cool that you like GGG. you can't just wish away his hypocrisy, lack of quality opponents on his resume (I'm sure you heard what Max said this past Saturday if you watched HBO), and the fact he didn't win the title in the ring.

and neither did your boogeyman Lara. And neither did Thurman. And neither did alot of other worthwhile fighters who are simply dealing with the disgusting WBA and their nonsense.....

and "fleeing the thread" is not "getting the better of" someone. Im still waiting for you to tell me the difference between "something is up", "smells fishy", and "fix was in".

On second thought, it doesnt matter. It will just be more of your doublespeak babble.......

[Willy Wanker]

Probably Angel, I hate them all though.

[removed]

Big John Fury beats them all on the same night!

[The Big Dunn]

and neither did your boogeyman Lara. And neither did Thurman. And neither did alot of other worthwhile fighters who are simply dealing with the disgusting WBA and their nonsense.....

and "fleeing the thread" is not "getting the better of" someone. Im still waiting for you to tell me the difference between "something is up", "smells fishy", and "fix was in".

On second thought, it doesnt matter. It will just be more of your doublespeak babble.......

Ok, but they are not the topic of discussion, GGG is. You can't be selectively mad at the WBA.

As for that thread-I explained it to you. I never said fix because I didn't think it rose to that level. I do maintain that there is something fishy when the 3 judges-and ONLY the 3 judges-have those scorecards for that fight.

NSB RBR scores, ringside scorers, Lederman, Max, Lampley literally everyone else had Walters winning. Of those scores, the fewest was 6-4, which would be closest to the judges.

That is a statistical impossibility. Couple this with the status of Walters contract and other questionable scores TR fighters have had when they are near the point of re-signing (ODH/shane 1, Manny/Bradley 1), and its fair to suggest something could be up.

[OnePunch]

Ok, but they are not the topic of discussion, GGG is. You can't be selectively mad at the WBA.

As for that thread-I explained it to you. I never said fix because I didn't think it rose to that level. I do maintain that there is something fishy when the 3 judges-and ONLY the 3 judges-have those scorecards for that fight.

NSB RBR scores, ringside scorers, Lederman, Max, Lampley literally everyone else had Walters winning. Of those scores, the fewest was 6-4, which would be closest to the judges.

That is a statistical impossibility. Couple this with the status of Walters contract and other questionable scores TR fighters have had when they are near the point of re-signing (ODH/shane 1, Manny/Bradley 1), and its fair to suggest something could be up.

there is no gray area. There either was a fix, or its gross incompetence. You have already ruled out incompetence with your "statistical impossibility" theory about that, so that only leaves "fix".

And if there was no fix, then what exactly "smells fishy"?

Stop talking like a politician. Take a position and own it, right or wrong. But you wont. You want to be able to infer that it was a fix, without actually saying it. No different that the people who say "no offense, BUT...."

[The Big Dunn]

there is no gray area. There either was a fix, or its gross incompetence. You have already ruled out incompetence with your "statistical impossibility" theory about that, so that only leaves "fix".

And if there was no fix, then what exactly "smells fishy"?

Stop talking like a politician. Take a position and own it, right or wrong. But you wont. You want to be able to infer that it was a fix, without actually saying it. No different that the people who say "no offense, BUT...."

You couldn't be more wrong. Ask around, taking a position is not something I shy away from. I even pointed out (confirmed by the TS) that my response was up before the edits he made.

Almost every poster, except you, suggests that there is a problem with these scores. They haven't said fix either. There can be problems with scores and there not be a fix.

If you see otherwise, so be it.

[OnePunch]

You couldn't be more wrong. Ask around, taking a position is not something I shy away from. I even pointed out (confirmed by the TS) that my response was up before the edits he made.

Almost every poster, except you, suggests that there is a problem with these scores. They haven't said fix either. There can be problems with scores and there not be a fix.

If you see otherwise, so be it.

and I'm asking you for the 20th time, if its not a "fix", then what exactly is the "problem"?

Or is it only a "problem" when it happens on a TR or GBP card?