Originally posted by The Big Dunn
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Algeri,why do some posters try to act like this guy is a top fighter?
Collapse
-
-
Originally posted by BigAlexSand View PostBroner last time I checked is 5'6".. Also a 5'5" Pacqauio dropped him 6 times. So it is feasible Broner could put a whooping on him.
and i dont even like lageri
Comment
-
Originally posted by LarryXXX View PostWhy? what has he done to be a top fighter? edge by Ruslan after getting dropped like a sack of ****? Getting dropped 6 times against Pacquiao while looking like a complete novice? Wobble the always wobbled glass chin Khan? What make this new Jersey Shore looking guy a top fighter?
3 non punching threats in a row....rios, Bradley then algieri
to build his confidence before cashing out
Algieri was undefeated and was a titlist, albeit the totally useless WBO belt
He was used by Arum to give of the illusion that Pacquaio of old was back...nothing more or less....now Top Rank has got on that horse, they have to ride it.
Comment
-
Originally posted by LarryXXX View PostWhy? what has he done to be a top fighter? edge by Ruslan after getting dropped like a sack of ****? Getting dropped 6 times against Pacquiao while looking like a complete novice? Wobble the always wobbled glass chin Khan? What make this new Jersey Shore looking guy a top fighter?
"Yo but...I would like to see how Mayweather deals with Algieri's angles doe..."
"But doe, Algieri's jab doe... p4p as strong as Wlad's jab doe..."
etc.
Comment
-
Originally posted by revs1227 View Posti would bet you every point $ item i own have or have ever came across that algeri beats broner
and i dont even like lageri
Comment
-
Lol people give a Algieri wayyy too much credit on here. N i still don't get it. He's not even good. He's dead mediocre.
Comment
-
This thread is premised on a logical fallacy.
The Original Poster asks "why do some posters try to act like this guy is a top fighter?"
Except nobody has ever argued that, it is not a mainstream position at all, and he doesn't even bother to link to a post in which someone made that argument. In other words the thread is based on bull *****.
This is a textbook case of strawmanning and doesn't deserve a serious response.
Of course, we all know why he made the thread . . .
Comment
-
Comment