Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

WBA to call for GGG v. Jacobs mandatory next week at the WBA annual convention!!!!

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #21
    Originally posted by Chollo Vista View Post
    GGG has yet to fight someone that can box AND has equal amount of power as himself, if not more. Most of the time, GGG's opponents can box, but can't bust a g****. Or some of his opponents can bust a g****, but can't box for sht.

    Jacobs will be the first that can do both. He will make GGG respect his power and fight timidly like he did against Lemieux, all the while Jacobs will actually be able to outbox him on the outside and will hurt him when GGG tries to anxiously go inside...

    Can't wait for many of these GGG fans to eat crow and run to MMA in the same night
    I hope you don't disapeer from this site when golovkin bodies jacobs.

    Comment


    • #22
      Aslong as they coincide with the WBC, If GGG has a shot of getting Canelo that should be first but who knows maybe Jacobs can be Canelo's saviour lol.

      Comment


      • #23
        Originally posted by about.thousands View Post
        Why would he be stripped? Jacobs/GGG is the best fight in the MW division right now while we wait on GGG/Canelo. Why wouldn't you want to see this fight?
        He thinks HBO won't let ggg fight off HBO and haymon will win purse bid thus golovkin dropping the belt. These dudes think everybody is against them

        Comment


        • #24
          Originally posted by OnePunch View Post
          well this is pretty transparent. I dont think the WBA has forced a mando (between super champ and regular champ) in the last 5 years or better, but now 24 hours after the fight they are talking about it?

          Listen, I love a GGG-Jacobs fight, and I hope there is a way to make it happen, but GGG cant fight Johnson, Canelo, Lee, and Jabobs all at the same time.

          This is nothing more than Haymon leaning on Mendoza in an effort to get GGG stripped so they can claim its a duck.
          Well it's not only Haymon or WBA, it happens to every champion, it's happening to Fury and Haymon is not involved in that. Every promoter is trying to look for a title for their fighter the easiest way possible. Now if you ask me, GGG vs Jacobs is much better than any other fighter not named Canelo. If GGG doesn't fight Johnson and gets stripped oh well, he's getting the same treatment as Fury. Blame the alphabet titles, there's 4 of them and promoters want one for their fighter the easiest way possible. It's boxing.

          Comment


          • #25
            Well Jabos have a nice life cause GGG is going to knock you out

            Comment


            • #26
              Originally posted by mike1010011 View Post
              I hope you don't disapeer from this site when golovkin bodies jacobs.
              I'm not going anywhere.. It's you and your buds that will pull a David Copperfield

              Comment


              • #27
                Originally posted by OnePunch View Post
                well this is pretty transparent. I dont think the WBA has forced a mando (between super champ and regular champ) in the last 5 years or better, but now 24 hours after the fight they are talking about it?

                Listen, I love a GGG-Jacobs fight, and I hope there is a way to make it happen, but GGG cant fight Johnson, Canelo, Lee, and Jabobs all at the same time.

                This is nothing more than Haymon leaning on Mendoza in an effort to get GGG stripped so they can claim its a duck.
                why not?

                that's classic al haymon. win belts through stripping fighters that can't fight on pbc and claim they are ducking because he refuses to fight on hbo. ex: Beterbiev turning down kovalev in order to try and fight an eliminator for one of kovalevs belts. so obvious he just wanted to win purse bid and steal the belt. he didn't care about getting all 3 belts because he knew he would prob lose.

                Comment


                • #28
                  Originally posted by OnePunch View Post
                  well this is pretty transparent. I dont think the WBA has forced a mando (between super champ and regular champ) in the last 5 years or better, but now 24 hours after the fight they are talking about it?

                  Listen, I love a GGG-Jacobs fight, and I hope there is a way to make it happen, but GGG cant fight Johnson, Canelo, Lee, and Jabobs all at the same time.

                  This is nothing more than Haymon leaning on Mendoza in an effort to get GGG stripped so they can claim its a duck.
                  Talking about it because they replied to my tweet... They didn't just go out and start talking about it. So if Jacobs vs golovkin happens 😀

                  Comment


                  • #29
                    Originally posted by about.thousands View Post
                    Why would he be stripped? Jacobs/GGG is the best fight in the MW division right now while we wait on GGG/Canelo. Why wouldn't you want to see this fight?
                    do you lack the ability to READ? I said i love the fight. But GGG already has the Johnson mando to deal with, and he cant be in 2 rings at once idiot.

                    Comment


                    • #30
                      Originally posted by HanzGruber View Post
                      He thinks HBO won't let ggg fight off HBO and haymon will win purse bid thus golovkin dropping the belt. These dudes think everybody is against them
                      GGG has made it clear on more than one occasion that he's all about the belts. Fighting mando's are a part of keeping the belt on his way to unifying. I don't see GGG turning down the fight and giving up the belt. Sanctioning organizations trump exclusive network deals. If you don't want to follow the rules of the sanctioning bodies don't fight for their belt.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X
                      TOP