Fastest Heavyweight of All Time?

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Verstyle
    Future Champion
    Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
    • Aug 2005
    • 33130
    • 2,466
    • 3,248
    • 49,262

    #71
    Originally posted by NextRocky
    wtf said i didnt notice a difference.

    well there ya go case closed

    Comment

    • 2nd II none
      I came to bring the pain
      Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
      • Aug 2004
      • 18974
      • 1,430
      • 418
      • 31,145

      #72
      Joe Louis had some pretty incredible hand speed himself.

      Comment

      • Easy-E
        Gotta want it
        Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
        • Jul 2005
        • 22686
        • 865
        • 1,739
        • 32,777

        #73
        Originally posted by mystyal2k5
        so u tell me if a 83 ali fought a lets say an 86s tyson it would be fair to rate tyson as faster although he's alot younger and in or near his prime?? your not makin ne sense. so does larry holmes suck ass cause tyson knocked him out out of his prime?? or did he go down quicker cause he was gettin older?? so in other words jus cause your young to u that means that u dont lose handspeed and u should be rated with who ever u were fighting at the time although they could have over 10years under u. your not makin ne sense.and what does age have to do with prime?? tyson was out of prime by 24 so that doesnt matter neither
        You are the one who is making no sense. Your rambling and assumptions are actully quite annoying. I said patterson was looking sharp for his age and in good form and you go on a nonsensical tirade about holmes, ali and not suprisingly, tyson, who seems to find a way into every single on of your posts.

        Comment

        • Verstyle
          Future Champion
          Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
          • Aug 2005
          • 33130
          • 2,466
          • 3,248
          • 49,262

          #74
          Originally posted by PBF34
          You are the one who is making no sense. Your rambling and assumptions are actully quite annoying. I said patterson was looking sharp for his age and in good form and you go on a nonsensical tirade about holmes, ali and not suprisingly, tyson, who seems to find a way into every single on of your posts.


          Originally posted by PBF34
          ive seen them both fight, and in their matchups, ali proved he was faster. he was ripping combinations on patterson. ali's 1-2 was something behold.

          thats what im going by. your taking an in there prime fighter and an out of prime fighter and tryin to compare there handspeeds like that. and ask ne 1 that doesnt make ne sense u cant compare 2 different ppls handspeeds at the times they fought in there career,its jus non-sense.


          and prove on my of my post i include tyson where he isnt needed. i'll gladly give ya 100million if ya can. cause thats the biggest lie probably on this forum today

          Comment

          • Easy-E
            Gotta want it
            Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
            • Jul 2005
            • 22686
            • 865
            • 1,739
            • 32,777

            #75
            Originally posted by mystyal2k5
            thats what im going by. your taking an in there prime fighter and an out of prime fighter and tryin to compare there handspeeds like that. and ask ne 1 that doesnt make ne sense u cant compare 2 different ppls handspeeds at the times they fought in there career,its jus non-sense.


            and prove on my of my post i include tyson where he isnt needed. i'll gladly give ya 100million if ya can. cause thats the biggest lie probably on this forum today
            What im saying is that no matter what, theres no way to prove who was faster, so its not worth being an ******* about it.

            Comment

            • Verstyle
              Future Champion
              Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
              • Aug 2005
              • 33130
              • 2,466
              • 3,248
              • 49,262

              #76
              Originally posted by PBF34
              What im saying is that no matter what, theres no way to prove who was faster, so its not worth being an ******* about it.

              i wasnt being an ******* what u said didnt make sense. thats like takin(i know u will hate this ) tyson vs. mcbride and sayin that mcbride hits harder then tyson when they fought cause tyson couldnt rock him. jus doesnt make ne sense to say that when u see what condition there in. ya get me?

              Comment

              • Easy-E
                Gotta want it
                Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                • Jul 2005
                • 22686
                • 865
                • 1,739
                • 32,777

                #77
                Originally posted by mystyal2k5
                i wasnt being an ******* what u said didnt make sense. thats like takin(i know u will hate this ) tyson vs. mcbride and sayin that mcbride hits harder then tyson when they fought cause tyson couldnt rock him. jus doesnt make ne sense to say that when u see what condition there in. ya get me?
                First, I never said you were being an *******. Second, your comparison's are way off.

                Comment

                • Verstyle
                  Future Champion
                  Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                  • Aug 2005
                  • 33130
                  • 2,466
                  • 3,248
                  • 49,262

                  #78
                  Originally posted by PBF34
                  First, I never said you were being an *******. Second, your comparison's are way off.

                  so were yours ahahahaha. tryin to compare old speed to new speed is crazy

                  Comment

                  • IAMTHEGREATEST
                    Banned
                    • Mar 2006
                    • 152
                    • 20
                    • 0
                    • 222

                    #79
                    The fact is both fighters where fast, and no one ****ing knows who the fastest is accept maybe the fastest, and thats if he acknowledges it, Ali acknowledges that his the greatest, and maybe that no one can katch his speed but thats it, Patterson, well ive never seen an interview or heard of one which he states his claim, this ****ing thread was an OPINION POST, and you motha****as went and mad it personal... If i had to choose a fighter id choose TYSON simple because he had the quickest bob leaft weave right throw a RIGHT HOOK that ive seen and im sure anyone else has seen on a constant base! Im also sure that if he came perpared,focused and vicious like he did his first 37 fights he woulda KOed both ALI and PATTERSON but along the way to GLORY a lot of us lose or motivation!

                    Comment

                    • Easy-E
                      Gotta want it
                      Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                      • Jul 2005
                      • 22686
                      • 865
                      • 1,739
                      • 32,777

                      #80
                      Originally posted by mystyal2k5
                      so were yours ahahahaha. tryin to compare old speed to new speed is crazy
                      I said that the patterson that fought Ali was in good form. Proof of this is that he continuted to fight for 7 more years after this defeat. I never said that the patterson fight is the only reason Ali is faster, but it certianly helps the argument.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      TOP