If he wanted to be clear and specific, he wouldnt have left it up to interpretation.
Maybe this was an olive branch. Hopefully. But its way too criptic for us to be definitive about anything. Look at the way he answered the Kovalev-Stevenson question.
I would have prefered something like " There is no longer a so called Haymon ban, we want to work with his fighters for the good of boxing".
Maybe this was an olive branch. Hopefully. But its way too criptic for us to be definitive about anything. Look at the way he answered the Kovalev-Stevenson question.
I would have prefered something like " There is no longer a so called Haymon ban, we want to work with his fighters for the good of boxing".
Comment