Yes please. Brook - Khan is one of the best fights that can be made right now. Winner should face Thurman in another huge fight.
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Comments Thread For: Amir Khan: If No Pacquiao, I Can Fight Kell Brook
Collapse
-
-
-
Amir Khan just wants legacy fights, Brook obviously just wants to cash in on the weight of Khans name pretty sad tbh!
The guy with the championship belt is meant to be the one calling the shots and looking to unify the belts and so on but what has Brook done so far?
Cried about Khan
Fought bum after bum
Cried some more about Khan
Begged Khan even harder for the biggest payday of his career
Annnddd that's it!
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by LacedUp View PostYou literally said: "the fight is big because Khan is in it" which is absolute horse crap. It's big because of the two of them.
That's a very silly comparison. Brook is the only one out of the two of them with a legit WW win.
Khan definitely would never fight someone like Chaves.
My point was Khan can still do a big fight without Brook, so Kell is being involved in a big fight cuz of King. He did 16 K vs McCloskey the record speaks for itself. He lost momentum in UK cuz of his absence even then Diaz wasn't so bad given it was in Sheffield, casuals unlike us are on to the next one quick. Brook can't even headline his own PPV lol plus when did he fill an arena as big as Khan like he did vs a no namer like McCloskey? Kell needed a card with 2 other title fights and Mr Humble to get a big crowd against a guy of similar caliber in Gavin.
Yawn! Ummm how long was that ago and whom has he fought since? He just got caught lying about a fictional Bradley fight he was so excited about. Plus I don't know what does that have to do with being a big name, Bute was a definition of paper champion, yet he is HUGE in Canada, selling ability and resume aren't correlated, although in Khan's case its 2/2.
So, far nor is Kell.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Box-Office View PostMy point was Khan can still do a big fight without Brook, so Kell is being involved in a big fight cuz of King. He did 16 K vs McCloskey the record speaks for itself. He lost momentum in UK cuz of his absence even then Diaz wasn't so bad given it was in Sheffield, casuals unlike us are on to the next one quick. Brook can't even headline his own PPV lol plus when did he fill an arena as big as Khan like he did vs a no namer like McCloskey? Kell needed a card with 2 other title fights and Mr Humble to get a big crowd against a guy of similar caliber in Gavin.
Yawn! Ummm how long was that ago and whom has he fought since? He just got caught lying about a fictional Bradley fight he was so excited about. Plus I don't know what does that have to do with being a big name, Bute was a definition of paper champion, yet he is HUGE in Canada, selling ability and resume aren't correlated, although in Khan's case its 2/2.
So, far nor is Kell.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Dirk Diggler UK View PostMarquez turning down a fight with Khan doesn't in turn make Khan on Mayweather/Pacquiao's level
What kind of paper thin premise is that?
Glass chinned Khan beat Maidana with 8 ounce gloves, TBE needed 2 attempts, 10 ounce pillows. So, he is on a high level for sure,
I get it you're upset at Khan/hate, however you wanna phrase it, but saying Khan at no point deserved it would be stretching it. Especially in the case of Pac.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Box-Office View PostMarquez clearly thought Khan was on his level, not like Khan was high risk low reward either.
Khan beat Maidana with 8 ounce gloves, TBE needed 2 attempts, 10 ounce pillows.
I get it you're upset at Khan/hate however you wanna phrase it, but saying Khan at no point deserved it would be stretching it. Especially in the case of Pac.
Same applies to Mayweather and Pacquaio.
Khan went life and death with Chris Algieri in his last fight, arguably drew or lost to a guy who Pacqaiao humiliated.
That's where Khan is at the moment.
Comment
-
Comment