Tweet
No if he would've fought Brook instead of Khaning around and beat him, he would probably be in line for Pac fight.
-
-
Sound like Khan don't want to be in the WBC tournament, win 3 fight and become the new WBC champion KhanComment
-
..the same Brook who nobody knew and hadn't fought anybody? But... LOLComment
-
Khan: "I'm pretty sure Pacquiao isn't fighting Bradley or Crawford". lol
Then you can bet it is either Crawford or Bradley, and place a second bet Khan is not fighting Brook in May. He'll make demands to keep the fight from happening. I'm amazed Khan thinks he's the smartest guy he knows and he's still never been right. Khan gets KOd by Brook, Thurman, Porter, Bradley or Provodnikov which is why he won't fight ANY of them.Comment
-
Nobody believes Khan anymore.Comment
-
Absolutely!!! He say for three yrs begging Floyd for a lottery ticket; he tried everything. In the meantime he fought three tomato cans with lightweight punching power. He's now been playing the same card to beg Manny for a lottery ticket! He's trying to sell what he did at 140 5 years ago, which last I remember he was KOd by Swift. If he really believes he's the man at 147, he's had more than enough time to beat the top contenders: Thurman, Brook, Porter, Bradley to make it impossible for Floyd or Manny to tell him No. Khan is a real weasel and I'm tired of hearing his talking.Originally posted by Nomadic View PostComment
-
You literally said: "the fight is big because Khan is in it" which is absolute horse crap. It's big because of the two of them.Originally posted by Box-Office View PostHuh?
You obviously suffer from comprehension issues.
I never said its all Khan, surely fighting those bums and leeching off Khan's name has paid off for Brook, else he'd be another Jan Zavcek with an IBF belt, BUT Khan has been doing well without Brook, he has been pulling those million $ purses before Haymon started doing it with so many others.
Khan can make good $ and do well WITHOUT Brook where as Kell's whole career is based on cashing out on a Khan fight.
Remember when you told us Khan won't fight anyone like Chaves, well neither will Kell. How are the Bradley talks coming?
That's a very silly comparison. Brook is the only one out of the two of them with a legit WW win.
Khan definitely would never fight someone like Chaves.Comment
-
Your fanboy obsession with Khan is just so creepy.Originally posted by Box-Office View PostHuh?
You obviously suffer from comprehension issues.
I never said its all Khan, surely fighting those bums and leeching off Khan's name has paid off for Brook, else he'd be another Jan Zavcek with an IBF belt, BUT Khan has been doing well without Brook, he has been pulling those million $ purses before Haymon started doing it with so many others.
Khan can make good $ and do well WITHOUT Brook where as Kell's whole career is based on cashing out on a Khan fight.
Remember when you told us Khan won't fight anyone like Chaves, well neither will Kell. How are the Bradley talks coming?
Are you related? Because that is the only logical explanation.
Brook is fighting bums, Khan is fighting...nobody.
They are both too far up their own arses - that is the problem.
Khan should re-match Algieri, but he won't because he knows he could get beat.
Brook needs to find the balls to tell Eddie Hearn that he wants BIG fights.
Khan just needs to fight and stop running his mouth, every-time he opens it he embarrasses himself.Comment
-
If ole glass jaw had any balls and confidence he would already have an extra £6-10 m in his account from the Brook fight which everyone wanted when Amir chose to run off and fight a nobody. Had he won he would have got either Mayweather or Manny by public demand, instead he's not getting either ...by public demand....truth is he knew it would be certains.End of a career that spiraled down hill badly when limited Garcia knocked him to bits.Comment
-
Comment