Originally posted by saint laurent
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Comments Thread For: Fury To Honor Klitschko Rematch, Likely Vacate IBF Title
Collapse
-
-
Originally posted by Lou Cipher View PostThis is 4 fighters already being ducked by this big dumb goofy Turd. Dudes been "Champion" for 4 days and he's already written off fighting the top 4 challengers and is already losing a belt. What a big dumb goofy Turd.
Comment
-
Originally posted by OnePunch View PostI know, the NERVE of them to actually enforce their rules. They should be like the other sanctioning bodies who throw out the rule book every time they smell a nickel......
You fkn nerve of you...... making a girl out of yourself last week by supporting the WBC when they did EXACTLY that.
You support the rules, when it suits you..... and you support those other sanctioning bodies, when it suits you.
Comment
-
Originally posted by saint laurentBecause he wanted extra money. He was the mandatory, so he was in the driving seat. He didn't have to accept anything Wladimir handed out to him.
I stick by my point however, that this is going to come back and bite the IBF in the arse.
Comment
-
Originally posted by saint laurentVicious -
Haymon does about equal business with the WBC and WBA. Between the two, he usually has about a dozen world champions at any given time. He's also now starting to accumulate IBF titles as well. He pretty much ignores the WBO, which has become the Top Rank/HBO championship.
Fury Win -
Wladimir did not have the power to force a rematch clause on Fury as Fury was the MANDATORY challenger. Fury VOLUNTARILY agreed to a rematch clause because he was paid handsomely to do so. He knew the IBF mandatory was due and that in the event he beat Klitschko, he'd most likely have to give up the IBF title to honor the rematch clause. He made a business decision to accept payment for the clause. Nobody forced him to do it.
The organizations should not be expected to delay mandatories to accomodate rematch clauses. Organization rules make it very clear that rematch clauses are not valid.
At the end of the day, it's a loss for the sport. Fury deserves to be recognized as the #1 heavyweight in the world, but it hurts Fury, the IBF and the sport as a whole for Fury to throw the belt away. Makes you wonder how confident his team was that he was going to win because there'd be no reason to accept payment for a rematch clause if you're confident you're going to win.
Comment
-
Originally posted by OnePunch View PostThe IBF rules CLEARLY state that they do not recognize rematch clauses.
So what ?
The WBC did not mandate the WBA champ Wladimir Klitschko to Deontay Wilder, even AFTER Klitschko beat their #1 guy Povetkin..... and yet they played a completely different tune with the HBO fighter and WBA champ Gennady "money" Golovkin..... and yet you supported that no problem.
Comment
-
For the love of God can I get a GGG thread today boxingscene?!
Let me get that Ward lol or some more of that Kovalev is racist sht I like that
Fckin GGG it's been 2 fcking days lmaO next superstar my ass you boring FCK
This sht never happened to Floyd lmaO in fact Floyd is getting more spin than Golovkin and he's fcking retired
Comment
-
Originally posted by PittyPat View PostAnd this is exactly what I feared would happen, even though I like Fury and find him hugely entertaining. Sure, it's nice to have a fresh face at the top of the HW division and the entire sport of boxing itself, but it also means the unified titles are heading straight to splitsville just like in 1993.
It took 5 years for Wladimir to unify them with hard work and patiently fighting all mandatories, and the WBC was/is almost within reach, so this is not a good thing.
Comment
-
New Title: Fury to honor fans and land solid punches. Klitschko to honor fans and not mug and hold and actually fight.
Comment
Comment