Vid: Old Timer Joe "FBF" Cortez thought Cotto actually won, calls for Judges overhaul

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • .!WAR MIKEY!.
    Banned
    Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
    • Aug 2015
    • 23780
    • 889
    • 769
    • 309,182

    #21
    Originally posted by RavshinRicRude
    O rly? proof?
    he speaks on it in one of videos but I dont which one, he just names them episode 1,2 etc

    but ring magazine did a article on it.

    http://ringtv . craveonline . com/news/175657-from-the-pages-of-the-ring-magazine-a-new-perspective

    http://bit.ly/1QV4Yds

    Comment

    • extracurRICular
      Banned
      Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
      • Jul 2008
      • 13023
      • 1,499
      • 650
      • 105,740

      #22
      Originally posted by !WAR CANELO!
      he speaks on it in one of videos but I dont which one, he just names them episode 1,2 etc

      but ring magazine did a article on it.

      http://ringtv . craveonline . com/news/175657-from-the-pages-of-the-ring-magazine-a-new-perspective

      http://bit.ly/1QV4Yds

      Comment

      • Dirk Diggler UK
        Deleted
        Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
        • Jun 2008
        • 48836
        • 1,312
        • 693
        • 58,902

        #23
        Originally posted by PivotandRoll
        Joe Cortez is a man trying to sell a product who also most likely believes what he's saying...Tell me though, if Wlad had landed 1-2 flashy counter shots a round would he have deserved the decision since Fury was moving and didn't really throw anything of note? just saying....
        If your aunty had balls, would she be your uncle?

        Comment

        • PR ESQ.
          Undisputed Champion
          Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
          • May 2009
          • 1285
          • 63
          • 64
          • 7,778

          #24
          At the very least Cortez is bringing forth ideas to improve the vantage point of judges which we all know wo question needs to be revisited especially with the controversy surrounding the Cotto fight and numerous others...

          Comment

          • boliodogs
            Undisputed Champion
            Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
            • May 2008
            • 33358
            • 824
            • 1,782
            • 309,589

            #25
            He is Puerto Rican and he is wrong. Cotto fought well and put up a good fight but he clearly lost. Cotto won 4 rounds tops. Canelo landed more punches and the harder punches and was able to hurt Cotto while Cotto could not hurt Canelo. Cotto is an excellent 35 year old boxer who lost to an excellent 25 year old boxer who was too big, too young, too fast and hit too hard for him. The judges probably had Canelo the winner by a point or two extra but they had the correct winner. Cortez was a referee but he was never a judge and that's a good thing.

            Comment

            • The Hammer
              Banned
              Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
              • Dec 2007
              • 50797
              • 3,416
              • 8,704
              • 58,851

              #26
              Cortez was arguably the WORST referee of all time.

              He was shady as they come, always favoring the promoter's boxer.

              Soto-Lorenzo

              Hatton-Mayweather

              Coetzee-Snipes (Cortez acted as the third judge - A UPI poll of sportswriters stated, "Every writer polled at ringside had Coetzee well ahead of Snipes by anywhere from eight to six rounds.")

              Comment

              • PivotandRoll
                Undisputed Champion
                Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
                • Jan 2015
                • 2540
                • 98
                • 26
                • 9,327

                #27
                Originally posted by Dirk Diggler UK
                If your aunty had balls, would she be your uncle?
                Yes...She would be...

                SO I take you think Wlad would have won..okay that's fair

                Comment

                • Dirk Diggler UK
                  Deleted
                  Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                  • Jun 2008
                  • 48836
                  • 1,312
                  • 693
                  • 58,902

                  #28
                  Originally posted by PivotandRoll
                  Yes...She would be...

                  SO I take you think Wlad would have won..okay that's fair
                  Yeah Wlad would have won if he didn't lose badly lol

                  Comment

                  • bojangles1987
                    bo jungle
                    Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                    • Jul 2009
                    • 41118
                    • 1,326
                    • 357
                    • 63,028

                    #29
                    Makes sense. He's about as old and senile as the bad judges.

                    Comment

                    • PivotandRoll
                      Undisputed Champion
                      Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
                      • Jan 2015
                      • 2540
                      • 98
                      • 26
                      • 9,327

                      #30
                      Originally posted by Dirk Diggler UK
                      Yeah Wlad would have won if he didn't lose badly lol
                      wow you are such an insecure idiot you actually think I'm making an argument for Wlad....My point is that if he had landed 2-3 counters in the rounds...The perception would have changed and Fury's movement would have been seen as something he was doing to stay away..

                      It's pretty much that reason I had Canelo vs Cotto a draw..Despite Canelo's crisp flashy counters, Cotto was still landing punches.. IDC if they were hurting Canelo or not..

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      TOP