Originally posted by LoadedWraps
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Is Canelo what you considered a "slick" boxer?
Collapse
-
-
He outboxed and outslicked the supposedly slick Trout.
Canelo definitely has underrated slickness.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Boxfan83 View PostIve noticed Canelo has gained a fanbase of boxings purists. I am assuming its because he is more defensive vice offensive type of fighter. With that said, is Canelo slick?
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by PivotandRoll View Postokay clearly there is a misconception ...Erislandy Lara one of my favourite fighters and a man I think beat Canelo.. but he is not slick at all..he is athletic, precise and effective.... Canelo can stand right in front of you , just lean a shoulder and make you miss...That is slickness..
Another over looked slick fighter is Billy Joe Saunders...He's closer to Whitaker than Crawford if you aren't a racist moron
That is slickness. Just like Rigondeaux can crack you with a hook while turning with you.
You are slick when you can evade a combination, slip in counter punches, and get out.
Its not slick when you can just use good defense to avoid a combination but then have to get out to reset to start your own offense.
This is slick.
Comment
-
Originally posted by !! Shawn View PostRote memorized combinations don't really count as slick. The basic right hand/ right uppercut roll under isn't really being slick, as he would have done the movement if Cotto threw the hook or not.
Slick is being able to counter a counter.
But I still remember you telling me that Nadal was a finesse player whereas Federer was all power lol so I don't really consider you any kind of authority in style.
Comment
-
Canelo isnt slick. But he's defensively sound. I mean he's about as slick as Oscar was in his prime. No1 calls Oscar slick tho
Comment
Comment