Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Comments Thread For: Fury vs. Glazkov To Head Straight To Purse Bids

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #11
    Originally posted by The Big Dunn View Post
    Isn't this essentially the same thing GYM did relative to Stevenson/kov fight-refuse to negotiate and go right to purse bid?

    Kathy whines about this then does the same thing. What a ****ing cvnt!!
    Preach!!!!!!

    Comment


    • #12
      Originally posted by The Big Dunn View Post
      Isn't this essentially the same thing GYM did relative to Stevenson/kov fight-refuse to negotiate and go right to purse bid?

      Kathy whines about this then does the same thing. What a ****ing cvnt!!
      Does anyone know when the IBF mando is due? People can say what they want, but the IBF usually follows their rule book to the letter, and mandos typically can only be delayed for unifications.

      So Duva may be under the gun from Haymon about the Wilder fight, and may not have time to negotiate with Hennessey, as she will have to figure out which way to go.


      But yeah, its not really a good look for her lol

      Comment


      • #13
        Originally posted by Isaac Clarke View Post
        Trying to pick up a title without having to fight the champ, they know Fury has a Klitchko rematch he must fight.
        100%. Not a bad strategy to pick up a title. Kinda lackluster for the fighter & would really suck if he loses the vacant title fight.

        1. Vyacheslav Glazkov
        2. NOT RATED
        3. Tyson Fury
        4. Charles Martin
        5. Erkan Teper
        6. Steve Cunningham
        7. Artur Szpilka
        8. Lucas Browne
        9. Anthony Joshua
        10. Carlos Takam
        Wonder who gets the shot vs him if Tyson vacates. Charles Martin (he's fighting Breazeale on 12/12), Cunningham & Szpilka are all with Haymon. Teper is injured I guess. Martin might be wise to pull outta the Breazeale fight, although I kinda like his chances there.

        Comment


        • #14
          Originally posted by The Big Dunn View Post
          Isn't this essentially the same thing GYM did relative to Stevenson/kov fight-refuse to negotiate and go right to purse bid?

          Kathy whines about this then does the same thing. What a ****ing cvnt!!
          Yeah, there's a nice bit of hypocrisy there, but one thing I'll never accuse promoters of is being consistent. She's just trying to get her guy a slice of the pie.

          Funny thing is I always thought Glazkov was about the most boring fighter on the planet until I saw Wlad's performance on Saturday. Good luck to Duva, but I'm hoping someone just gives Czar some step-aside $s so everyone can get on with their business - that's probably what she's hoping too.

          Comment


          • #15
            Something here doesnt make sense. I just looked at the IBF website, and in their "results" section ,they list the Klitschko-Fury fight as a mandatory defense. If that is accurate, then Fury doesnt have a mando due for 12 months.

            Also, even if the Fury fight wasnt an IBF mando and their website is only referring to it being a WBA/WBO mando, their rules seem to indicate a new heavyweight champ has 12 months to do a mando anyways, as the rule reads "after acquisition".

            5.A.
            Heavyweight Division
            1.
            Mandatory Defense Obligation
            Because
            of the circumstances inherent in and peculiar to the promotion of
            major Heavyweight Championship Contests, the Heavyweight Champion shall
            defend his Championship within one (1) year after acquisition by him in a
            sanctioned contest scheduled for twelve (12
            ) rounds against the leading available
            contender designated by the Championships Chairman.




            Not sure why this would go to bid now if its not even due.......
            Last edited by OnePunch; 12-01-2015, 02:13 PM.

            Comment


            • #16
              Originally posted by OnePunch View Post
              Does anyone know when the IBF mando is due? People can say what they want, but the IBF usually follows their rule book to the letter, and mandos typically can only be delayed for unifications.

              So Duva may be under the gun from Haymon about the Wilder fight, and may not have time to negotiate with Hennessey, as she will have to figure out which way to go.


              But yeah, its not really a good look for her lol
              Yup, the IBF is usually the only org that follows it's rules. Mick Hennessy isn't really a big player anymore is he? She could probably win this bid or if he vacates it brings more leverage to the table with Wilder.

              Comment


              • #17
                Fury/Glazkov can happen before the Wlad rematch and these two fights should cover 2016. 2017 will probably be Fury v whoever is WBC champ then and then a big UK fight....AJ? More likely Haye.

                It's a long way to go but Fury is going to make a lot of money.

                Comment


                • #18
                  Originally posted by OnePunch View Post
                  Something here doesnt make sense. I just looked at the IBF website, and in their "results" section ,they list the Klitschko-Fury fight as a mandatory defense. If that is accurate, then Fury doesnt have a mando due for 12 months.

                  Also, even if the Fury fight wasnt an IBF mando and their website is only referring to it being a WBA/WBO mando, their rules seem to indicate a new heavyweight champ has 12 months to do a mando anyways, as the rule reads "after acquisition".

                  5.A.
                  Heavyweight Division
                  1.
                  Mandatory Defense Obligation
                  Because
                  of the circumstances inherent in and peculiar to the promotion of
                  major Heavyweight Championship Contests, the Heavyweight Champion shall
                  defend his Championship within one (1) year after acquisition by him in a
                  sanctioned contest scheduled for twelve (12
                  ) rounds against the leading available
                  contender designated by the Championships Chairman.




                  Not sure why this would go to bid now if its not even due.......
                  I think they're saying he has up to 12 months to defend against his mandatory challenger and then he can take voluntary fights.

                  Comment


                  • #19
                    Comments Thread For: Fury vs. Glazkov To Head Straight To Purse Bids

                    The dust has barely settled on Tyson Fury’s unanimous decision win over long-reigning world heavyweight Champion Wladimir Klitschko in Germany on Saturday night. However, the newly minted Champion has already discovered that boxing moves fast when you are a multi-title holder after the IBF revealed that Fury's mandatory defence against Yyacheslav Glazkov is heading to purse bids.

                    [Click Here To Read More]

                    Comment


                    • #20
                      this is why its almost impossible and pointless to get all the belts these days. its a shame it will never change either and the same bs belt orgs will continue to ruin the sport

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X
                      TOP