Who do you have higher on the p4p

[MPX309]

Klitchko
Kovalev
Pacquiao
Gonzalez
Bradley
Ggg
Canelo
Ward
Rigondeaux
Lomachenko

Lomachenko with his 5-1 record?

[Larry the boss]

Canelo's resume is clearly better

[M Bison]

Can't be the same.

Canelo with big wins as of recent he deserves to be ahead but I'd only have Canelo ahead of G by 1

Wladimir Klitschko
Saul Alvarez
Gennady Golovkin
Sergey Kovalev
Alexander Povetkin
Adonis Stevenson
Roman Gonzalez
Timothy Bradley
Terence Crawford
James DeGale

Hard to make a top 10 not gonna lie.

[LomaUsykKlichko]

I think we can only find out if they fight,Canelo has better names that he didnt really beat convincingly and then you have GGG who has avarage names that he just walked throught them.

[Raonic]

GGG.

Better fighter. Canelo is a good fighter with the resume but I don't think he's looked dominant in any fights. Trout and Cotto are his best wins while Murray and Lemieux are GGG's. Lara was controversial and Mosley was well out his prime while Kirkland is a puncher but not really highly regarded.

I'd probably call Trout and Murray a wash and while Cotto is more regarded than Lemieux, the gap in GGG and Canelo's talent is preferable to GGG.

[aldo5408]

GGG.

Better fighter. Canelo is a good fighter with the resume but I don't think he's looked dominant in any fights. Trout and Cotto are his best wins while Murray and Lemieux are GGG's. Lara was controversial and Mosley was well out his prime while Kirkland is a puncher but not really highly regarded.

I'd probably call Trout and Murray a wash and while Cotto is more regarded than Lemieux, the gap in GGG and Canelo's talent is preferable to GGG.

Murray is looking even worse to be honest since he got his ass beat by grandpa abraham

[Raonic]

Murray is looking even worse to be honest since he got his ass beat by grandpa abraham

I don't think it should affect how we should judge him at the time when he fought GGG. He was really the real lineal champ at 160 at the time and was a good top 10 contender at 160.