Comments Thread For: Canelo Wins Big, Stays Firm on Golovkin Weight Stance

[kafkod]

This thread did not " die " kid..... I am still here.

I live in a different timezone, so you may have to wait for me to laugh/reply to your dribble.

You shameless fanboy clown..... you made the statement in my sig, because your main priority was a "fair fight"..... what your shameless flip-flop proved, is that when it comes to your current girlfriend Hypekin, a "fair fight" is actually not one of your main priorities

NOW, everyone knows that not only are you a shameless fanboy flip-flopper, they also know that you are a dishonest POS who will attempt to lie your way out of a difficult situation.

You could admit that you are wrong, and that your current viewpoint is clearly biased?????

#creepyfanboy****

Another reminder: I made the comment in your sig because you said that after he'd fought on the Cotto/Canelo bill, Ward should publicly challenge GGG, in front of the crowd, to move up and fight him at 168, no catchweight.

I replied saying that if he did that, in front of a boxing crowd, it would backfire on him, for the reasons given in that quote.

Remember now?

[aboutfkntime]

They send GGG an offer when he was available? I didn't know that.

I suppose you are not thinking about the e-mail Ward send when GGG had a PPV fight lined up?

I also assume that you are not mistaken a call-out for an offer sheet and therefore have the sufficient links to back up your offer claims?

Oh and do you think Ward has offered Klitschko a fight?

1) I am talking about the 2 offers that were BOTH rejected outright by K2.
* The catchweight demand they know Ward cannot make
* The offer that was rejected in 25 minutes flat

2) I am talking about HBO having no problem signing Kovalev/Ward, thereby KILLING all of your money/timing/a-side doe, excuses

3) I am talking about the fact that having a poor resume including not 1 world-class fighter, when a more than solid argument exists that you could have fought 4 of them and yet CHOSE not to..... aint a good look.

[aboutfkntime]

Another reminder: I made the comment in your sig because you said that after he'd fought on the Cotto/Canelo bill, Ward should publicly challenge GGG, in front of the crowd, to move up and fight him at 168, no catchweight.

I replied saying that if he did that, in front of a boxing crowd, it would backfire on him, for the reasons given in that quote.

Remember now?

No you did not kafkod, because you were not replying to me.....

Do you have any more excuses to explain your shameful flip-flop ?

Dude, get fkn real..... the ONLY reason why a catchweight could possibly exist would be to enable a fair fight.

NOBODY is defending catchweights here, because I think they should be abolished..... but YOU whole-heartedly supported a catchweight demand on Ward because you felt that it was "unfair" on the smaller guy.

Then you shamelessly flip-slopped on the " smaller guy "..... in support of your new girlfriend Golovkin.

And I caught your buddy HeroBando doing the exact same thing.

[kafkod]

No you did not kafkod, because you were not replying to me.....

Do you have any more excuses to explain your shameful flip-flop ?

Dude, get fkn real..... the ONLY reason why a catchweight could possibly exist would be to enable a fair fight.

NOBODY is defending catchweights here, because I think they should be abolished..... but YOU whole-heartedly supported a catchweight demand on Ward because you felt that it was "unfair" on the smaller guy.

Then you shamelessly flip-slopped on the " smaller guy "..... in support of your new girlfriend Golovkin.

And I caught your buddy HeroBando doing the exact same thing.

Does it make a difference whether the comment I replied to was addressed to me or not?

You posted saying that Ward should take the mic at the Cotto/Canelo show and publicly challenge GGG to fight him at 168, and I gave my opinion on that.

Re what you call the catchweight demanded from Ward: Loeffler and GGG both answered hypothetical questions about what it would take to make the fight and the answer they both gave was "50/50 on money and weight"

It seemed clear to me that what they were looking for was a bigger share of the purse in return for taking the risk of fighting Ward at 168. Maybe I'm wrong about that, I'm not a mind-reader, but that's the way I saw it.

Whatever, asking for a catchweight from a man in a higher division is acceptable, and turning down a catchweight from a man in a lower division is also acceptable. Neither man should be called a duck or a coward when that happens.

Demanding a catchweight to defend a world title against a man in the same division as the title you hold is a different situation entirely.

That's not acceptable and I wouldn't support any fighter who tried to do it, including Golovkin.

[aboutfkntime]

Does it make a difference whether the comment I replied to was addressed to me or not?

You posted saying that Ward should take the mic at the Cotto/Canelo show and publicly challenge GGG to fight him at 168, and I gave my opinion on that.

Re what you call the catchweight demanded from Ward: Loeffler and GGG both answered hypothetical questions about what it would take to make the fight and the answer they both gave was "50/50 on money and weight"

It seemed clear to me that what they were looking for was a bigger share of the purse in return for taking the risk of fighting Ward at 168. Maybe I'm wrong about that, I'm not a mind-reader, but that's the way I saw it.

Whatever, asking for a catchweight from a man in a higher division is acceptable, and turning down a catchweight from a man in a lower division is also acceptable. Neither man should be called a duck or a coward when that happens.

Demanding a catchweight to defend a world title against a man in the same division as the title you hold is a different situation entirely.

That's not acceptable and I wouldn't support any fighter who tried to do it, including Golovkin.

You are an absolute shameless flip-flopping b1tch.

The ONLY reason why a catchweight should ever be considered would be to ensure a fair fight..... and that was the point you were making with Ward/Golovkin..... so stop lying kid, you are shamefully ignorant.

You demanded that Ward accept Golovkin's catchweight demand..... and you stated that Ward is a coward for refusing, because it would not be a fair fight due to the weight disparity..... despite the fact that Hypekin was willing to fight Froch/Chavez at 168.

But with Golovkin/Canelo you see things completely different..... NOW the weight is not an issue, NOW a fair fight is not an issue..... NOW it is all about the titles doe

You shameful flip-flopping ******.

It was sooooo important to you to enable a "fair" fight, that you resorted to calling Ward a coward for refusing..... but when it comes to Golovkin, you have no concerns whatsoever over the weight, or whether the fight is "fair"..... now its all about what benefits your guy.

Grow up kid, only a very small child would find your position reasonable or acceptable.

[kafkod]

You are an absolute shameless flip-flopping b1tch.

The ONLY reason why a catchweight should ever be considered would be to ensure a fair fight..... and that was the point you were making with Ward/Golovkin..... so stop lying kid, you are shamefully ignorant.

You demanded that Ward accept Golovkin's catchweight demand..... and you stated that Ward is a coward for refusing, because it would not be a fair fight due to the weight disparity..... despite the fact that Hypekin was willing to fight Froch/Chavez at 168.

But with Golovkin/Canelo you see things completely different..... NOW the weight is not an issue, NOW a fair fight is not an issue..... NOW it is all about the titles doe

You shameful flip-flopping ******.

It was sooooo important to you to enable a "fair" fight, that you resorted to calling Ward a coward for refusing..... but when it comes to Golovkin, you have no concerns whatsoever over the weight, or whether the fight is "fair"..... now its all about what benefits your guy.

Grow up kid, only a very small child would find your position reasonable or acceptable.

Now you are resorting to bare-faced lies. I have never demanded that Ward should fight GGG at 164. On the contrary, I have said many times that I don't believe he can even make 168 any more, let alone 164.

And I have never called Ward a coward either.

Golovkin vs Canelo, of course, would be a title fight in the middleweight division, and GGG is a middleweight. What part of that very simple proposition do you not understand?

[aboutfkntime]

Now you are resorting to bare-faced lies. I have never demanded that Ward should fight GGG at 164. On the contrary, I have said many times that I don't believe he can even make 168 any more, let alone 164.

And I have never called Ward a coward either.

Golovkin vs Canelo, of course, would be a title fight in the middleweight division, and GGG is a middleweight. What part of that very simple proposition do you not understand?

Let me point out three obvious reasons why you are a two-faced POS.

1) You said this.....

I made the comment in your sig because you said that after he'd fought on the Cotto/Canelo bill, Ward should publicly challenge GGG, in front of the crowd, to move up and fight him at 168, no catchweight.

Well, I said no such thing, so that excuse is bull**** kid.

And then, when I called you out on it, you said this.....

Does it make a difference whether the comment I replied to was addressed to me or not?

So, you just admitted you made up the fact that you were replying to me LMFAOOOOOOOOO

And get this, you stated that I wanted Ward to " call out " Golovkin..... well, I fkn did not..... that childish approach is ridiculous. I laugh at casual fans who think its all about "call him out doe".

This aint WWE kid.

2) If you admit that you know Ward cannot make 164, then insisting that he give Hypekin a catchweight was extremely dishonest fanboy bull****.

3) You absolutely DID call Ward a coward for not giving Golovkin a catchweight, because the quote is in my sig, and here is the link.....

http://www.boxingscene.com/forums/sh...1#post15995401

#b1tchmadecasualfans

[dr.french]

Let me point out three obvious reasons why you are a two-faced POS.

1) You said this.....



Well, I said no such thing, so that excuse is bull**** kid.

And then, when I called you out on it, you said this.....



So, you just admitted you made up the fact that you were replying to me LMFAOOOOOOOOO

And get this, you stated that I wanted Ward to " call out " Golovkin..... well, I fkn did not..... that childish approach is ridiculous. I laugh at casual fans who think its all about "call him out doe".

This aint WWE kid.

2) If you admit that you know Ward cannot make 164, then insisting that he give Hypekin a catchweight was extremely dishonest fanboy bull****.

3) You absolutely DID call Ward a coward for not giving Golovkin a catchweight, because the quote is in my sig, and here is the link.....

http://www.boxingscene.com/forums/sh...1#post15995401

#b1tchmadecasualfans

Jesus Christ. Stop nitpicking and arguing over semantics and he said she said. Just focus on the actual argument.

And why would GGG go up to fight Ward? Ward is a nobody. They can fight, but Ward will have to come down to 160. GGG will gladly fight him then. Until then, Ward is owed nothing.

Now stop playing this idiotic game of nitpicking words that proves nothing.

[aboutfkntime]

Oh, and the 4th reason why you are a dishonest POS, is because you attempted to intentionally mislead people by dishonestly inserting this comment in your sig......

Originally Posted by aboutfkntime
Read the post above and tell me how smart you feel.

You absolutely know that post did not refer to the post above it in your sig.

Even though having my comment in your sig is a badge of ******ity, because that comment is 100% correct..... it is dishonest of you to insinuate that the comments are connected in any way..... because they obviously are not.

You are reaching badly, you dishonest POS.

[aboutfkntime]

Jesus Christ. Stop nitpicking and arguing over semantics and he said she said. Just focus on the actual argument.

And why would GGG go up to fight Ward? Ward is a nobody. They can fight, but Ward will have to come down to 160. GGG will gladly fight him then. Until then, Ward is owed nothing.

Now stop playing this idiotic game of nitpicking words that proves nothing.

OK, so..... ALLLLL of those excuses that Team Golovkin made were bull****.

So now it is..... " why should he fight Ward " ?

Right ?

Gotcha ^^

Read bread's mailbag...... oh, perhaps go get a tissue first.....
http://www.boxingscene.com/daily-bre...te-more--98642