Little Rigo says he's too small for Lomachenko.

[LomaUsykKlichko]

The rehydration clause was agreed to though.

Yeah they will gladly dismiss that, Loma agreed to all demands Rigo pulled out of the fight

[Tom Cruise]

The rehydration clause was agreed to though.

Nope.

http://www.boxingscene.com/lomachenk...ondeaux--93735

[HanzGruber]

The rehydration clause was agreed to though.

No it wasn't. I remember that sky sports article and saying they're always wrong. That quote was from rigos manager who he was about to fire. Everyone was all excited for no reason

4 days later - "loma rejects rehydration clause" http://www.boxingscene.com/lomachenk...ondeaux--93735

[Ray Corso]

Rigo is a very small man in height thickness and his overall frame.
Lomo by bell time would have 15-20 pounds on him and strength is not part of Rigo's game! He makes 118 easily and 126 with a rehydrate clause is what the guy needs. If he fights at 126 my guess is he's in shape at 124 at the most. The guys like 5'4" Lomo at 126 adds 15lbs by bell time easily.
A bantam vs a junior welter is what it would be. Not a fare fight.
Ray

[HanzGruber]

Yeah they will gladly dismiss that, Loma agreed to all demands Rigo pulled out of the fight

No it wasn't keep reading

[Tom Cruise]

Yeah they will gladly dismiss that, Loma agreed to all demands Rigo pulled out of the fight

No he didnt.

Hyde said that Klimas initially rejected a catchweight but agreed to a rehydration clause. However after speaking to Lomachenko himself Klimas then came back and rejected both.

TBH I doubt Klimas actually agreed to anything. He probably agreed to speak to Loma about it and Hyde span it

[Luilun]

http://youtu.be/qgfbJINaM5s
Rigo offers the fight to Loma at 126 with rehydration clause now he too small for Loma.

Gee Rigo Floyd, Marquez and Manny were to small for most of the fighters they fought

[Doctor_Tenma]

Rigondeaux IS too small for Lomachenko, I've been saying that before the fight looked viable, I don't know how anyone can argue that.

[Dirk Diggler UK]

No it wasn't. I remember that sky sports article and saying they're always wrong. That quote was from rigos manager who he was about to fire. Everyone was all excited for no reason

4 days later - "loma rejects rehydration clause" http://www.boxingscene.com/lomachenk...ondeaux--93735

Yeah I remember that. And I'm sure there was a follow-up article where Lomachenko did agree to it.

I don't think there should be a rehydration clause anyway. I doubt you would be waving your pom poms for it if Golovkin asked Ward for one.

For some reason Rigo is allowed to play these games without getting criticised.

[LomaUsykKlichko]

No he didnt.

Hyde said that Klimas initially rejected a catchweight but agreed to a rehydration clause. However after speaking to Lomachenko himself Klimas then came back and rejected both.

TBH I doubt Klimas actually agreed to anything. He probably agreed to speak to Loma about it and Hyde span it

Lomachenko says in this video that they agreed to the rehydration clause which was 10 pounds.
http://youtu.be/XeCnfYPXzjI