Comments Thread For: WBC Derecognizes Cotto; Title Only At Stake For Alvarez

[MDPopescu]

Yeah I don't understand that. How can they claim to be Non-Profit?

... it means they don't hold stock shares and they are not paid dividends, doe.

[b00g13man]

Cotto is bigger than a belt.

[bojangles1987]

Wow if this is true the WBC should be ashamed of themselves.

I wouldn't double pay either.

Damn they threw that non-profit **** out there to make them seem as the victims. shameful.

So they stripped him because of sanctioning fees. They couldn't wait and see if Cotto won and then try to extort him to face Golovkin?

We Be Crooks indeed.

[lopez36]

well if he didnt pay the sanctiong fees,,,

[imperial1]

What in the ****? What is the reasoning here?

Extortion from the WBC

[PRBOXINGCOTTO]

typical wbc bull**** giving away belts to any Mexican fighter so you strip cotto before a big fight just so you can try and hand it to canelo well guess what cotto is going to beat the **** out of your Mexican hero Saturday and ggg will take the belt because canelo is not fighting ggg nobody tells cotto what to do so he gave you the finger **** the wbc

[Cuban Linx]

People are complaining "They're trying to get GGG a vacant"... well if those two keep ducking him then...

[Mr.Fantastic]

This is pretty unfair to be honest. Look how many years they had Floyd without defending the title and they didn't do jack.

[MDPopescu]

Wow if this is true the WBC should be ashamed of themselves.

I wouldn't double pay either.

Damn they threw that non-profit **** out there to make them seem as the victims. shameful.

WBC previously ruled about the GGG step aside money. The fee for sanctioning the title fight is also regulated.

[Deevel916]

All fighters should unite and just dump their belts all on the same day. They mean jack shiet anyway! Get rid of all these money sucking alphabet organizations and have just 1.