Originally posted by nveleven
View Post
It wasn't an ugly win. It was complete domination and so one-sided that the people who claim the fight was close struggle to name more than 2 rounds that Pacquiao won. It was that one sided. Everyone in boxing knew what Floyd was going to do, every discussion about the fight was "What was Manny going to do to beat Floyd?" Not the other way around and we saw that Manny couldn't do a thing.
Losing to Floyd back in 2009 would have been worse. Manny was firmly establishing himself as PPV attraction. He was constantly fighting in Vegas and selling out. Arum was making a ton of money off him and promoting as the "Anti-Floyd", "the one who could beat him". If Floyd had fought him back then and beat him, what would Arum and Pacquiao have to go on next? The hype would have been completely killed. The entire premise on what they were promoting Manny on would have been shut down, what next? More rematches with Marquez? Fight Bradley? Who would Arum have as the cash cow? We already saw what Manny's PPV buys were against Bradley, Rios and Algeiri.
He used Manny. This why they can't even agree on when his "injury" took place or who Manny is fighting next. It just looks ridiculous. Now Arum wants to feed him to Crawford. If Arum really cared about what Manny wants, he would do everything in his power to get him a rematch with Floyd.
Comment