Why then are some people complaining about Lomachenko's level of opposition in his first fights? I'm sure a lot of you have seen posters claim that stuff that happens in the amateurs has no real bearing on the professional game and we can't use that as a sole barometer of success or talent.
So really, taking away all that amateur experience and accomplishment, he is still green as hell for a pro, and some leeway has to be given (if of course we are going by the logic that the ams don't really matter)
Although I would love Lomachenko to be fighting champions or highest level championship opposition every fight, i'd be shocked if anyone can find someone who has fought better opposition in his first six fights as a pro. I'll wait.
Of course, the argument can be that Lomachenko is now a champion/belt holder so he should be held with a different expectation, and I fully agree with that, but unfortunately a lot of fights with top guys can't seem to be made...
The funny thing is, i'm willing to bet that if Loma did not have a title belt and had his current resume, people would be raving about the competition he has fought in so little time as a 'contender'.
I hold high hopes for the immediate future that Loma can get big fights with big opponents and let's just hope boxing politics doesn't get in the way too much, but my overall point is that we can't just change up the rules and logic for individual fighters - if we base Loma's capabilities so much on his am success, then we can't neglect that aspect for other fighters, because there have been plenty of fighters with outstanding am records who were not as fast-tracked as Loma and no-one complained there.
Discuss
So really, taking away all that amateur experience and accomplishment, he is still green as hell for a pro, and some leeway has to be given (if of course we are going by the logic that the ams don't really matter)
Although I would love Lomachenko to be fighting champions or highest level championship opposition every fight, i'd be shocked if anyone can find someone who has fought better opposition in his first six fights as a pro. I'll wait.
Of course, the argument can be that Lomachenko is now a champion/belt holder so he should be held with a different expectation, and I fully agree with that, but unfortunately a lot of fights with top guys can't seem to be made...
The funny thing is, i'm willing to bet that if Loma did not have a title belt and had his current resume, people would be raving about the competition he has fought in so little time as a 'contender'.
I hold high hopes for the immediate future that Loma can get big fights with big opponents and let's just hope boxing politics doesn't get in the way too much, but my overall point is that we can't just change up the rules and logic for individual fighters - if we base Loma's capabilities so much on his am success, then we can't neglect that aspect for other fighters, because there have been plenty of fighters with outstanding am records who were not as fast-tracked as Loma and no-one complained there.
Discuss
Comment