What's a Top Fighter?

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • SilverMiles
    It Was A Draw Doe!!!!
    Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
    • Jul 2014
    • 4445
    • 488
    • 103
    • 35,552

    #11
    Originally posted by PBP.
    Wlad beat Povetkin (#1).....Baldomir is an aberration. Upsets happen in boxing. Props to him for his accomplishment.
    So there's two number 1 per division if one is considered the champion then the guy ranked beneath him would be a top fighter?

    So if Povetkin beat Wilder it wouldn't be considered a win over a top fighter but if Wilder beat Povetkin it would be?

    Or would Wilder have to beat Wlad?

    Comment

    • SilverMiles
      It Was A Draw Doe!!!!
      Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
      • Jul 2014
      • 4445
      • 488
      • 103
      • 35,552

      #12
      Originally posted by Eff Pandas
      I think it depends on the person what a top fighter is. And good luck getting everyone to agree with that. Pretty sure there is a solid segment of boxing fans who think there are like 8 top fighters in boxing.

      Personally I feel like anyone in the top 1% of their division (usually the top 15 or so guys) should be considered top or elite level guys.
      I usual go with top ten because good luck getting anyone to agree with the top 15.

      But i think a lot of people take for granted how hard it is to be ranked top 10 or even 15. I mean good promotion helps but there's a lot of other guys out there fighting for a living and for you to be considered Top 10 out of a thousand is pretty special.

      A lot of people call Rios a bum but the guy was the #2 LW while campaigning there.

      Comment

      • -PBP-
        32 Time World Champion
        Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
        • Jan 2012
        • 24107
        • 836
        • 635
        • 34,297

        #13
        Originally posted by SilverMiles
        So there's two number 1 per division if one is considered the champion then the guy ranked beneath him would be a top fighter?

        So if Povetkin beat Wilder it wouldn't be considered a win over a top fighter but if Wilder beat Povetkin it would be?

        Or would Wilder have to beat Wlad?
        Who has Wilder beaten to be considered a top fighter? He's an unproven contender with 1 top 10 win.

        So yes. If Wilder beats Povetkin, it would be a win over a top fighter because Povetkin is the clear cut #1 guy in the division. But if Povetkin beats Wilder, he's basically doing what he's supposed to do as the #1 guy in line for Wlad's titles.

        Comment

        • SilverMiles
          It Was A Draw Doe!!!!
          Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
          • Jul 2014
          • 4445
          • 488
          • 103
          • 35,552

          #14
          Originally posted by PBP.
          Who has Wilder beaten to be considered a top fighter? He's an unproven contender with 1 top 10 win.

          So yes. If Wilder beats Povetkin, it would be a win over a top fighter because Povetkin is the clear cut #1 guy in the division. But if Povetkin beats Wilder, he's basically doing what he's supposed to do as the #1 guy in line for Wlad's titles.
          You have some pretty harsh standards but at least their clear cut and I can respect that.

          Comment

          Working...
          TOP