is Middleweight Division weak or is GGG just too Good?

[just the facts]

There are lots of good middleweights but GGG is a great middleweight and too good for any of them.

A fighter with ZERO quality wins is great? Man your standards are low. ggg might actually end up being a great fighter, but can we wait until he beats an actual A list opponent before we give him that tag

[The Big Dunn]

I think GGG is very good and the MW division is very, very bad.

[j0zef]

It's no different than all other divisions. There's 2-3 good names - MW has Golovkin, Cotto/Canelo/Lee, SMW has chunky/jack/AA, LHW now has Kov/Adonis/Ward.

Only difference is that so far, Golovkin has shown more of a mantra of invincibility than anyone else. As he fights better fighters (or as he ages), that will go away.

[OnePunch]

A fighter with ZERO quality wins is great? Man your standards are low. ggg might actually end up being a great fighter, but can we wait until he beats an actual A list opponent before we give him that tag

you have a strange definition of "quality". One could make the argument that GGG has not faced an "elite" level opponent yet, but that is solely because they have chosen to avoid him. That speaks VOLUMES about how other fighters perceive him.

As to "quality", if you dont consider Murray, Macklin, Geale, Lemieux, Proska, Rosado, and Stevens to be "quality" opponents, then you really dont need to say anything else. Your obvious bias speaks loud and clear.