Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Comments Thread For: Sanchez: Golovkin Will Go Anywhere To Face Carl Froch!

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Someone clue Team Little G in to the fact that both Floyd and Froch are retired.

    If GGG is really looking for the biggest financial rewards then look no further than Canelo. Once he beats Cotto he'll be waiting for Golovkin at 155.

    Comment




    • "You don't make a fight with GGG Vs Ward at 168lbs just because 5-10 nerds on Boxingscene are begging for it"

      Comment


      • Originally posted by Dirk Diggler UK View Post
        Of course you will. An ageing retired fighter who you think will be easy to hit and will give you a nice payday.

        Sorry but Froch isn't going to get out of bed for a guy who sells 97k PPVs when he did 900k in his last fight.

        I've never heard of a fighter taking a paycut to come out of retirement.
        First it was, " Golovkin: I'll fight anyone at 154, 160, 168 "
        http://espn.go.com/blog/new-york/box...-at-154160-168

        Then Andre Ward announced his comeback.

        So it became, " Golovkin: I'll fight anyone at 154, 160, 164 "
        http://www.boxingscene.com/golovkins...0-split--93258

        Then Ward said that he would consider a catchweight.

        So it became, " Nobody at 154/160 can go 12 rounds with Golovkin "
        http://www.mma-core.com/videos/Abel_...ht_us/10102303

        Then Cotto/Canelo both insisted upon a catchweight.

        So now it is, " Gennady Golovkin eyes unification at middleweight "
        http://www.ibtimes.com.au/boxing-new...titles-1476074

        Then Ward moved to LHW.

        So NOW it is, " Golovkin Will Go Anywhere To Face Carl Froch! "
        http://www.boxingscene.com/sanchez-g...l-froch--97726

        WTF ??????????

        When the Golovkin hype-train left the station, most fans were under the impression that GGG actually wanted to fight guys like Ward/Cotto/Canelo.

        Comment


        • damn talk about pathetic to even say it... froch is past his prime and on top of that retired, and these cherry pickers want to act like big bad wolves

          Comment


          • Originally posted by mike1010011 View Post
            I'm one of golovkins biggest fans but I can see why people can hate on him,and its actually because of abels big mouth. If you guys want to stick to unifying the 160lb belts,then go for it. But don't start talking about wanting to fight 168 lb fighters, and expect not to be called out on not wanting to fight EVERY 168 lb fighter.
            Exactly, Golovkin has failed to even attempt to live up to his own hype.

            But nobody gets to blame Sanchez for that.

            Golovkin, and his official representatives Loeffler/Sanchez, have played that song for YEARS..... Gennady knows EXACTLY what is going on, and he is playing along with it hook-line-and-sinker.

            Just like Pacquiao did with Arum/Top Rank.

            An adult human being is 100% RESPONSIBLE for the words/actions of his official representatives.

            Comment


            • Originally posted by aboutfkntime View Post
              First it was, " Golovkin: I'll fight anyone at 154, 160, 168 "
              http://espn.go.com/blog/new-york/box...-at-154160-168

              Then Andre Ward announced his comeback.

              So it became, " Golovkin: I'll fight anyone at 154, 160, 164 "
              http://www.boxingscene.com/golovkins...0-split--93258

              Then Ward said that he would consider a catchweight.

              So it became, " Nobody at 154/160 can go 12 rounds with Golovkin "
              http://www.mma-core.com/videos/Abel_...ht_us/10102303

              Then Cotto/Canelo both insisted upon a catchweight.

              So now it is, " Gennady Golovkin eyes unification at middleweight "
              http://www.ibtimes.com.au/boxing-new...titles-1476074

              Then Ward moved to LHW.

              So NOW it is, " Golovkin Will Go Anywhere To Face Carl Froch! "
              http://www.boxingscene.com/sanchez-g...l-froch--97726

              WTF ??????????

              When the Golovkin hype-train left the station, most fans were under the impression that GGG actually wanted to fight guys like Ward/Cotto/Canelo.
              great post, thanks for posting these articles and shining some light on common sense, even though ggg fans won't recognize what common sense is but nonetheless awesome post

              Comment


              • Originally posted by bambam182 View Post
                GGG will fight froch at 168, yet wants catch-weight with ward and golvokin fans defend his decision saying ward has no room to talk since he isnt a draw yet he beat froch and won the super six tournament lol.

                GGG fans are the new pac-tards. "GOLOVTARDS"
                It's worse than that, not only have they not mentioned Froch since he retired, they haven't mentioned any SMW. Remember this..... "Nobody at 154, 160 Lasts Twelve With Golovkin".
                http://www.boxingscene.com/sanchez-n...olovkin--97123

                Now that Ward has moved to LHW they start sneaking up to 168 to try and resurrect the corpse of Froch

                Comment


                • Fk me, these clowns are ridiculous.....

                  1) " anyone from 154-168 "

                  2) " anyone from 154-164 "

                  3) " anyone from 154-160 "

                  4) " 160 only "

                  5) " 160 only, except Lara "

                  6) " 160 only, except Lara, but we will fight Froch "

                  If Froch suddenly agree's, will it go back to " 160 only, except Lara " ?

                  Comment


                  • Originally posted by Xi_ View Post
                    Yea your feelings were hurt. You're still talking about it. Get out of your mother's basement and get some fresh air. Lmao at you getting worked over a name. You mad as hell.
                    No...you have it all wrong. For example, Va-GGG-ina would be better.

                    I was just pointing out that the name you chose was lame, and that you were trying too hard. Your assumptions about we were false.

                    Have a nice day.

                    Comment


                    • Originally posted by bigjer88 View Post
                      No...you have it all wrong. For example, Va-GGG-ina would be better.

                      I was just pointing out that the name you chose was lame, and that you were trying too hard. Your assumptions about we were false.

                      Have a nice day.
                      weak af.......you have some nerve talking about creativity.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X
                      TOP