Comments Thread For: Khan: Brook Must Prove Himself To Make Our Fight Huge

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Box-Office
    Russo Guy
    Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
    • Dec 2013
    • 7620
    • 245
    • 483
    • 14,068

    #71
    Originally posted by Dirk Diggler UK
    That was Khan against Algieri. That fight literally could have gone either way.

    I guess it's the new Khantard tactic that you've arranged behind the scenes to try to rewrite history and claim that Porter was in the Brook fight.
    Im not the only one. Off the top of my head, Fury on his latest Ifl interview said the same or did I pm him too?

    Comment

    • Dirk Diggler UK
      Deleted
      Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
      • Jun 2008
      • 48836
      • 1,312
      • 693
      • 58,902

      #72
      Originally posted by Box-Office
      Im not the only one. Off the top of my head, Fury on his latest Ifl interview said the same or did I pm him too?
      Yeah and your new minion/bum chum Frankie Bruno immediately made a thread about it

      Comment

      • Box-Office
        Russo Guy
        Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
        • Dec 2013
        • 7620
        • 245
        • 483
        • 14,068

        #73
        Originally posted by Dirk Diggler UK
        Yeah and your new minion/bum chum Frankie Bruno immediately made a thread about it
        I didn't see, but thanks.

        Comment

        • Dirk Diggler UK
          Deleted
          Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
          • Jun 2008
          • 48836
          • 1,312
          • 693
          • 58,902

          #74
          Originally posted by Box-Office
          I didn't see, but thanks.
          Yeah. Course you didn't. It's just a coincidence that all the Khantards are now saying that Brook didn't really beat Porter. The latest excuse in the laundry list for the worst duck in recent history.

          Comment

          • Ham Porter
            Undisputed Champion
            Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
            • Oct 2013
            • 2552
            • 242
            • 51
            • 9,574

            #75
            Originally posted by Arma316
            You have Brook confused with Khan.
            Or, ya know...both of them. Brook & Khan are both taking the easy route, not fighting anyone remotely dangerous while protecting their brand & not wanting to risk any potential big payoff in the end. For Brook, it's Khan; for Khan, it's Mayweather/Pacquiao.

            Neither one of them are worth defending at this point. They represent everything wrong with professional boxing at the minute.

            Comment

            • Nomadic
              Undisputed Champion
              Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
              • Mar 2013
              • 5533
              • 226
              • 969
              • 28,516

              #76
              Thought May and Pac was ridiculous, these drama queens are really ridiculous. At least May and Pac was #1 and #2 on the list on the P4P. Khan pretends as he is already #1 and Brook needs to work on getting to #2. What a joke Khan.

              Comment

              • thack
                Undisputed Champion
                Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
                • Dec 2007
                • 12864
                • 2,931
                • 1,340
                • 53,931

                #77
                Brook has proved himself by beating a then undefeated champion to win the title away in America , Khan is the one with it all to prove but as we know is too frightened to do that for fear he will again be found out the first time he steps out of his weak opponent comfort zone.
                What do people not get here ?

                Comment

                • MC Hammer
                  Undisputed Champion
                  Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
                  • Dec 2011
                  • 3533
                  • 149
                  • 95
                  • 29,084

                  #78
                  Originally posted by BrometheusBob
                  Nah Judah wasn't a big deal. He won a vacant title fighting someone who had no business in a title fight, and had no subsequent defenses of the title before fighting Amir (who was probably the mandatory, I don't recall).

                  Alexander and Maidana were good wins.
                  Maidana at the time was just a brute, and Alexander had already been beaten by Porter and Bradley. Khan had a great reach and spees advantage and was able to use that against a guy whose whole game has been his speed advantage and probably his chin. Also Alexander was never known for having that Khan kryptonite (power)

                  Comment

                  • Showtime..
                    Banned
                    Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
                    • Mar 2014
                    • 3888
                    • 141
                    • 200
                    • 4,673

                    #79
                    Originally posted by Dirk Diggler UK
                    Yeah. Course you didn't. It's just a coincidence that all the Khantards are now saying that Brook didn't really beat Porter. The latest excuse in the laundry list for the worst duck in recent history.
                    Porter fight was as close as the Algieri fight.

                    Comment

                    • Dirk Diggler UK
                      Deleted
                      Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                      • Jun 2008
                      • 48836
                      • 1,312
                      • 693
                      • 58,902

                      #80
                      Originally posted by Showtime..
                      Porter fight was as close as the Algieri fight.
                      Aren't you the guy who said Judah beat Garcia and that Bute was winning against Froch?

                      Opinion invalid.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      TOP