Damn, when you know you're this good if every opponent is a mismatch and has to be prevented by NSAC.
Comments Thread For: Andre Ward-Murdock Rejected By NSAC as Mismatch
Collapse
-
He was ranked #6 by the wbo at 168. The fight would be at 175,a weight the 23 year old kid had never fought at. Don't try to twist this,and make it look like it wasn't going to be a complete mismatch.Barcham said that the only rankings that matter are the belt rankings. Murdock was #6 on WBO. SMFH, this guy deserves justice. He is the WBO's #6 best fighter and he's a mismatch for Andre Ward. Imagine if GGG vs Adama, Monroe Jr, Ishida happened in Las Vegas, would the NSAC have rejected them as mismatches as well?Comment
-
I don't think so. Ggg wasn't nowhere near p4p, and both of those guys had challenged for titles at MW and went the distance and won some rounds.Barcham said that the only rankings that matter are the belt rankings. Murdock was #6 on WBO. SMFH, this guy deserves justice. He is the WBO's #6 best fighter and he's a mismatch for Andre Ward. Imagine if GGG vs Adama, Monroe Jr, Ishida happened in Las Vegas, would the NSAC have rejected them as mismatches as well?Comment
-
5 of Rupert's 19 fights have taken place above the SMW limit. 2 of those 5 have taken place above the LHW limit.Comment
-
-
ward fans defending ward and his choice of opponents. no surprise. the biggest hypocrites ever. talk sh-it about ggg because no one would fight him but defend ward who tries to fight bums as his first option. 4 years running now and they still defending this clown. he can do no wrong.Comment
Comment