Hit and not get hit type of boxer

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • boxinghead530
    Banned
    Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
    • May 2015
    • 3491
    • 147
    • 82
    • 5,299

    #1

    Hit and not get hit type of boxer

    I have a question for all knowledgeable and basic boxing fans in general. I don't know if this hypothetical question was asked before and I know hypothetical questions can be ridiculous because for the most part it will never happen. But I wanted to have fun with this question and get your idea and thought on my question.

    What if every fighter was a master boxer at hitting and not getting hit. How would the sport look to you. Would you still be a huge die hard? How would things play out!
  • Jc8804
    Undisputed Champion
    Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
    • Mar 2013
    • 6231
    • 394
    • 143
    • 30,652

    #2
    It would look like floyd vs pac and the sport would become the closest thing to pro fencing and karate

    Comment

    • Doctor_Tenma
      Monster
      Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
      • Apr 2009
      • 33313
      • 1,327
      • 1,249
      • 58,127

      #3
      The sport thrives on styles, and it's a weird hypothetical because not everyone is good at hitting and not getting hit.

      Comment

      • The Big Dunn
        Undisputed Champion
        Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
        • Sep 2009
        • 70179
        • 9,901
        • 8,188
        • 287,568

        #4
        Originally posted by boxinghead530
        I have a question for all knowledgeable and basic boxing fans in general. I don't know if this hypothetical question was asked before and I know hypothetical questions can be ridiculous because for the most part it will never happen. But I wanted to have fun with this question and get your idea and thought on my question.

        What if every fighter was a master boxer at hitting and not getting hit. How would the sport look to you. Would you still be a huge die hard? How would things play out!
        the sport's main axiom is "styles make fights". if there is never a contrast of styles, the sport would suffer whether its all brawling or all hitting and moving.

        Comment

        • Mr.MojoRisin'
          Crawling King Snake
          Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
          • Jul 2015
          • 2458
          • 77
          • 53
          • 10,555

          #5
          Then it would be a bunch of bums shadow boxing with another person in the ring.

          Comment

          • Bram
            Interim Champion
            Gold Champion - 500-1,000 posts
            • Jun 2006
            • 954
            • 26
            • 67
            • 7,419

            #6
            I don't think I understand the premise. If every fighter was a master of hitting and not getting hit, then there would be no hitting and thus no masters of hitting or everything would land and thus no masters of not getting hit. Something would have to give.

            Comment

            • Bram
              Interim Champion
              Gold Champion - 500-1,000 posts
              • Jun 2006
              • 954
              • 26
              • 67
              • 7,419

              #7
              Originally posted by Mr.DagoWop
              Then it would be a bunch of bums shadow boxing with another person in the ring.
              That. That's what I was trying to say.

              Comment

              • Larry the boss
                EDUCATED
                Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                • Jan 2011
                • 90798
                • 6,419
                • 4,473
                • 2,500,480

                #8
                I think that defines boxing,hit and not get hit..why the hell would you get hit on purpose?

                Comment

                • boxinghead530
                  Banned
                  Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
                  • May 2015
                  • 3491
                  • 147
                  • 82
                  • 5,299

                  #9
                  Originally posted by Bram
                  I don't think I understand the premise. If every fighter was a master of hitting and not getting hit, then there would be no hitting and thus no masters of hitting or everything would land and thus no masters of not getting hit. Something would have to give.
                  It's just s hypothetical question. I'm just trying to have fun on this Friday. Just getting you idea of what y'all think.

                  I agree and like you answer.

                  Comment

                  • boxinghead530
                    Banned
                    Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
                    • May 2015
                    • 3491
                    • 147
                    • 82
                    • 5,299

                    #10
                    Originally posted by LarryXXX
                    I think that defines boxing,hit and not get hit..why the hell would you get hit on purpose?
                    So you wouldn't mind if every fighter was a master at hitting and not getting hit?

                    Comment

                    Working...
                    TOP