Originally posted by gauze
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Adrien Broner > Golovkin
Collapse
-
-
I think the level of opposition they both beat is kind of similar, Broner however faced better opposition but he came up short in his 2 biggest fights with a disgraceful performance against Porter.
From the eye test, GGG is technically a much better fighter, more well rounded, better IQ, more power and so on, but as far as accomplishments, Broner has the edge cuz he moved up a lot of weight classes and won titles in all of them in like 5 years, GGG has been a pro for almost 10 years, Lemieux was the first reigning champion GGG faces and he only faced 1 former middleweight champion in a 10 year 34 fight long career.
Comment
-
Originally posted by HanzGruber View PostAb would be undefeated if he stayed at one weight for 10 years too
Comment
-
I'm gonna go with the guy who takes on all comers. After seeing Broner bow down to Guerrero after he talked all that schist, I knew he was all mouth. Anyone who tries to fight Golovkin does, and pays dearly.
Comment
-
-
I voted Broner simply because of him taking two hard fights that i did not expect of him.
Maidana and Porter
Comment
-
I like GGG and I'm not an Adrien Broner fan but honestly speaking, Broner has by far had the better career. Only thing GGG has going is being undefeated and Lemieux is his first win against a reigning champ. Losses to Marcos Maidana and Shawn Porter beat GGG's best win. Broner has fought more current/former champs than GGG and he's only 26.
I like GGG but I'm not going to pretend that his resume is better than Broners, I can't do it. However if he unifies 160 and beats either Cotto or Canelo then that changes, and he surpasses Broner if he does that AND wins a title at 168 while being undefeated.
Comment
Comment