Adrien Broner > Golovkin

[Lester Tutor]

The expression in boxing: ''Who has he fought!?''

Broner weights!?:

Won Vacant WBO Super Feather against Vicente Martin Rodriguez
Won WBC Lightweight title from defending Champ Antonio Demarco
Won WBA Welterweight title from defending (2 weight class) champ Paulie Maligaggi
Won WBA (Super) Light Welterweight title against former champ Khabib Allakhverdiev
Loss 12 Rounds against HEAVY 147 hitters Marcos Maidana and Shawn Porter.

Golovkin 160:

Promoted to WBA Champion from Interim
Defending WBA & ''IBO'' belts against former Light Middleweight Champ, Kassim Ouma, 10 rounds
Defends WBA (Super) and ''IBO'' belts against former IBF, WBA (Super) & ''IBO'' champ, Geale
Defending & Unifying against IBF 1 time defending champ, Lemieux

[From Russia]

Lost to Quintero, PDL, Maidana, Porter. Fought weakest champions. He is a B- fighter.

[DreamerUSA]

Ab would be undefeated if he stayed at one weight for 10 years too

I like Broner as a fighter, but just no. You really think he beats Uchiyama at 130 or Crawford at 135/140?

[Chrismart]

[IMG]https://media.*****.com/media/13jghlUIB6FHZm/*****.gif[/IMG]

[Syf]

No.

Broner has flaws that GGG does not have. Don't parade paper titles in front of me..his only halfway decent one was against Demarco. The others were vacant titles against weak opposition. Or the Malignaggi fight which many thought Magic Man won...

GGG has dominated 160, and has Canelo and Cotto running scared, and Sergio before them. He has dominated every opponent put in front of him. And for those who have the eye, he has far better fundamentals than Broner. Just his jab and ring genetalship alone puts him in a different class.

Joke thread

[The Big Dunn]

GGG has more skills than Broner. He is more professional than Broner. He has better offense, defense, power, footwork, ring IQ than Broner.

Broner has accomplished more and has the better resume.

[Trinidad_Fan]

The poll results speak for themselves.
Next dumb poll question.....

[Syf]

GGG has more skills than Broner. He is more professional than Broner. He has better offense, defense, power, footwork, ring IQ than Broner.

Broner has accomplished more and has the better resume.

He has not accomplished more. Vacant titles against padded records. It's not a huge deal doing multiple weights. Dude BEEN cutting 20 lbs or more since his super featherweight days. He was HUGE at super featherweight, lightweight, and Jr welterweight. His power was a myth he was just a big guy beating up on smaller guys. He's basically been a Jr welterweight or welterweight his whole career he just boiled down.

I'm sure GGG could have boiled down to 154 and picked up a vacant title and gone up to 168 and got a vacant title.. big deal! Hes doing more significant work unifying 160!

[The Big Dunn]

He has not accomplished more. Vacant titles against padded records. It's not a huge deal doing multiple weights. Dude BEEN cutting 20 lbs or more since his super featherweight days. He was HUGE at super featherweight, lightweight, and Jr welterweight. His power was a myth he was just a big guy beating up on smaller guys. He's basically been a Jr welterweight or welterweight his whole career he just boiled down.

I'm sure GGG could have boiled down to 154 and picked up a vacant title and gone up to 168 and got a vacant title.. big deal! Hes doing more significant work unifying 160!

Broner has won his titles in the ring, he wasn't elevated to champ like GGG. That he could make weight was the same thing ODH and Donaire were able to do. It doesn't lessen the accomplishments.

If you disagree, that's fine.

GGG, IMO, is better than Broner in every way. Broner has gone up in weight and won fights/titles. Can't take that away from him.

[Dean_Razorback]

the only 2 meaningful fights that broner fought he lost them badly. i don't think anyone can do to GGG what chino did to broner. not even close.