Wha does manny pacquiao have to do to be considered p4p #1

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • STAX ON DECK
    Banned
    Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
    • Nov 2012
    • 3990
    • 324
    • 134
    • 6,094

    #11
    beat crawford,thryman,garcia,porter,maidena,khan

    Comment

    • DeandreXI
      Contender
      Silver Champion - 100-500 posts
      • Sep 2015
      • 383
      • 22
      • 6
      • 6,668

      #12
      Originally posted by STAX ON DECK
      beat crawford,thryman,garcia,porter,maidena,khan and a rematch against bradley
      FIFY

      10 char

      Comment

      • Joe Beamish
        Undisputed Champion
        Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
        • Aug 2014
        • 3475
        • 157
        • 42
        • 30,582

        #13
        Originally posted by PK3434
        Knockout Khan in 2 rounds, and then knockout Crawford both in 2016.

        But let's be honest. Manny is on the decline and I really hate to say it, but he lost is aggressive killer instinct when he became a born again Christian.
        ...and a congressman
        ...and a singer
        ...and a basketball player

        Comment

        • Showtime..
          Banned
          Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
          • Mar 2014
          • 3888
          • 141
          • 200
          • 4,673

          #14
          Already have him #1.

          Would only help his cause if he beats Brook next year. I don't understand WHY the fight isn't being made.

          Comment

          • DeadLikeMe
            ................
            Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
            • Dec 2011
            • 11968
            • 748
            • 1,409
            • 26,662

            #15
            I don't really have a problem with people rating him #1. Personally I rate Wlad #1 but he has been #2 on my list since ktfo6 anyway. Does beating Bradley (for a second time in the eyes of most) and losing to Floyd warrant the #1 spot? Meh, sure why not at this point. At least Manny has paid his dues more than a GGG or Chocolatito.

            Comment

            • aldo5408
              Undisputed Champion
              Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
              • Mar 2012
              • 7589
              • 499
              • 724
              • 16,792

              #16
              Originally posted by STAX ON DECK
              beat crawford,thryman,garcia,porter,maidena,khan
              He can knock out all of those easy expect danny garcia. Pac beats garcia by UD

              Comment

              • aldo5408
                Undisputed Champion
                Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
                • Mar 2012
                • 7589
                • 499
                • 724
                • 16,792

                #17
                Originally posted by DeadLikeMe
                I don't really have a problem with people rating him #1. Personally I rate Wlad #1 but he has been #2 on my list since ktfo6 anyway. Does beating Bradley (for a second time in the eyes of most) and losing to Floyd warrant the #1 spot? Meh, sure why not at this point. At least Manny has paid his dues more than a GGG or Chocolatito.
                Agree 110%

                Comment

                • UNBIASED BOXING
                  NSB APESTA
                  Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
                  • May 2015
                  • 2832
                  • 125
                  • 4
                  • 26,180

                  #18
                  I have no issues with rating Pacquiao #1. Nor do I with Klitschko, or even Roman Gonzales. At this point, I think the top 3 are well established. Now it's just simply a matter of determining which one deserves it the most recently.

                  I honestly think Pacquiao deserves it the most, despite his decline, though.

                  Comment

                  • deathofaclown
                    Undisputed Champion
                    Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
                    • Apr 2015
                    • 16328
                    • 3,926
                    • 50
                    • 98,604

                    #19
                    I think p4p should be determined by what you have done in recent times, not past achievements or skill level. Like Ward, highly skilled but has fought no high level competition in about 3 years, and only 2 fights. For all we know, Ward might have missed his prime and be on the decline, there's no recent proof one way or the other.

                    Anyway, as far as Pacquiao goes, well part of me thinks he will never reach the top of that list again as he's getting older and not the fighter he once was. In decline basically but then you have to remember it's Pacquiao, not an ordinary fighter. I believe even if he has 85% left of what he was, he can beat any current fighter around his weightclass, apart from Floyd...and he's "retired" anyway. So who knows, 1 solid and 1 very good win and people might place him up there but really the hype has shifted.

                    HBO have Gonzalez and Golovkin now, Manny is the past. As long as those two keep winning, HBO and the boxing media will hold them in high regard and they will dominate the top of the p4p lists.....not that it really means anything anyway.

                    Comment

                    • aldo5408
                      Undisputed Champion
                      Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
                      • Mar 2012
                      • 7589
                      • 499
                      • 724
                      • 16,792

                      #20
                      Originally posted by deathofaclown
                      I think p4p should be determined by what you have done in recent times, not past achievements or skill level. Like Ward, highly skilled but has fought no high level competition in about 3 years, and only 2 fights. For all we know, Ward might have missed his prime and be on the decline, there's no recent proof one way or the other.

                      Anyway, as far as Pacquiao goes, well part of me thinks he will never reach the top of that list again as he's getting older and not the fighter he once was. In decline basically but then you have to remember it's Pacquiao, not an ordinary fighter. I believe even if he has 85% left of what he was, he can beat any current fighter around his weightclass, apart from Floyd...and he's "retired" anyway. So who knows, 1 solid and 1 very good win and people might place him up there but really the hype has shifted.

                      HBO have Gonzalez and Golovkin now, Manny is the past. As long as those two keep winning, HBO and the boxing media will hold them in high regard and they will dominate the top of the p4p lists.....not that it really means anything anyway.
                      I disagree
                      I have Manny P number one again
                      he easily beat a top welterweight in Bradley

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      TOP