Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Comments Thread For: Hearn: Carl Froch Would've Only Taken Golovkin Fight

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #21
    People put stock in Rafael's Catchweight Article, but ignore his article about Ward

    About Ward being unable to make 168 anymore.


    Originally posted by imperial1 View Post
    Yeah at a catch weight yet offered lesser fighters a fight at their full weight limit ..Let me guess its about money right ..

    And Ward has elite names on his resume GGG does not ..GGG has more fights than Ward explain that ?


    I mean biased I'm stating facts ..There seems to be a huge bias with GGG I mean to drag down a fighter like Ward who is much more accomplished is the epitome of bias ,all with the excuse of money ..Since when did you guys become financial,p advisors I thought this was the fight game ..Its about greatness what's so great about mismatches and mismatches it's time to step up!

    Comment


    • #22
      Originally posted by Dirk Diggler UK View Post
      That's exactly what I said all along. Why would you take the Golovkin fight for half of what you got paid for George Groves?

      Makes no sense at all to take a pay cut at 38 years old when you've become a star.

      If Golovkin's team or HBO can meet Carl's pay bracket now, then make the offer. Would love to see it next year.
      They blatantly ducked Andre Ward..... they selected Monroe over Lara and justified that choice by stating that Monroe is a bigger draw..... and now it looks like they will refuse to give 153lb Cotto a catchweight despite Golovkin stating yesterday that he can still make 154.

      I wouldn't hold my breath on a Froch fight.

      They may have fought Chavez but I can't pick through their bullshht anymore.

      Comment

      Working...
      X
      TOP