-
-
Like I said how many times I need to feed you your own ****? You ignore your own post every time I repost it. You had an opportunity to explain it, instead you claim you're being misinterpreted. You didn't mean to claim Ward's not getting treated as fair as Golovkin. Then what were you claiming with that post? Go ahead, spin something..Comment
-
The post was about the hype about GGG.
I then quoted an article showing the hype, which cited a comparison between Ward & GGG. I used it for the above purpose. I never mentioned Ward.
It had nothing to do with Ward being treated unfair.
Maybe you have a comprehension problem. Or you just another lil f*g who jumped in to save his hero without fully comprehending what they quoted. Which is it?Comment
-
Loooooool. GGG fanboys are just waaaaaaaaay too sensitive.Comment
-
You were insinuating preferential treatment for Golovkin because Ward wasn't given the same praise/criticism for his fight. Golovkin's stay busy fight exceeded expectations, Ward's mega fight failed expectations. Just because they both hit the same numbers, doesn't give you justification to demand they be criticized/praised the same.
You took two very different circumstances out of context to drive an agenda. Next time compare apples to apples.Comment
-
Oh now, I'm insinuating
FYI, 99% of that post was quoted from an article. Fromt he colon until the last sentence, actually. And again, I was discussing Golovkin's popularity, not Ward's treatment which is what you claimed.
You were wrong. You can try to continue to defend it (you seem pig-headed enough to do that) or just know you misunderstood and jumped in to save your hero. It happens.Comment
-
Wrong about what? You're insinuating Ward/Golovkin should receive the same treatment, but basing it off two very different fights. Doesn't matter if you plagiarized someone else, you posted it to support your own erroneous point. By claiming Golovkin gets preferential treatment, you're insinuating Ward doesn't get treated fairly.Oh now, I'm insinuating
FYI, 99% of that post was quoted from an article. Fromt he colon until the last sentence, actually. And again, I was discussing Golovkin's popularity, not Ward's treatment which is what you claimed.
You were wrong. You can try to continue to defend it (you seem pig-headed enough to do that) or just know you misunderstood and jumped in to save your hero. It happens.
The reporter being quoted looked at the numbers for those two fights in context. You look at the numbers for those two fights w/o context so that you can use it to support an agenda.Comment
-
Tweet
Comment