Better win - Brook > Porter or Khan > Alexander

[Eff Pandas]

If everyone just made posts about **** the fanboys of any particular fighter said this place would be severely dumbed down.

Having said that I don't think a reasonable boxing fan would suggest Porter isn't a better scalp to have than Alexander just off the fact Porter beat Alexander. That doesn't even get into the L that happened the other night with Alexander which would be another "final nail" in the coffin of that discussion.

[bigjavi973]

Khan's win is better. Porter vs Alexander was almost a toss up, so was Brook vs Porter. Close fights which could have gone either way. They fight 10 times, they win 5 each. One judge had Brook vs Porter a draw.

Khan shutout Alexander for 12 rounds, the fight was the very definition of a mismatch.

So Khan's thoroughly dominating performance against a fighter who was very evenly matched with Porter was a better win than Brook's closely-contested Porter win.

this guy

[Zaroku]

Porter is a tough fight for anyone - and Brook won a very close decision.

As for Alexander - he has declined and did not appear motivated when Khan beat him.

People can Hype Khan as much as they like, but he is fading fast.

Even Hunter is saying Khan's ego is out of control.

Wait for Khan to start blaming other fighters for 'ducking' him or changing his trainer or Ramadan or whatever.

The guy just needs to prove himself in the ring, its that simple.

Echo park, I agree. Hay dios mio, you put it down to the fullest. I think his next catastrophic loss may be attributed to Ramadan, & Allah Akbar.

Allah blessed him with speed, power, and a super-fragilistic-easy-KO-doshiuus chin.

Good post. Green to you.

[Bushbaby]

Brook out-muscled, outpunched and outboxed Porter. I didn't expect that.

Khan beat up Devon, I didn't expect that.

But Porter proved head to head, he is a better fighter than Devon.

[techliam]

Brook is ranked higher for a reason

[LacedUp]

Good to see this crazy notion has been shot down bluntly. 5 shameless Khan fans are the only ones not voting for Porter - 3 of them even not shameless enough to vote for their own guy. Surprise. Saving face lads.

Why is box office not in this thread? Why are you running like Khan is from Brook?

[JACK1190]

Kell's win over Porter is twice the win of Khan over Alexander! And you are ******ed if you think other wise.

[Elotero]

brook vs porter was a sloppy ugly fight with hardly any action from each. Dont remember much action other than hitting and holding tbh. The credit some give to Brook like he dominated is ridiculous. The guy is talented, that is his best win BUT it really could have gone either way. Had to vote Khan. More clean punches and damage to a higher level opponent.

[FlatLine]

this guy

That's the sort of thing peeps say when they can't actually provide any worthwhile argument.

[FlatLine]

Good to see this crazy notion has been shot down bluntly. 5 shameless Khan fans are the only ones not voting for Porter - 3 of them even not shameless enough to vote for their own guy. Surprise. Saving face lads.

Why is box office not in this thread? Why are you running like Khan is from Brook?

I provided an airtight argument as to why Khan's win is superior and nobody will be able to refute it.

Khan's win is superior to Brook's win for a number of reasons as previously stated. If you think about it carefully, weigh up all the factors I mentioned, it's not even a debatable point.

That's not to say Brook's win against Porter was completely worthless, it was still a good win, even if it was a very close fight. It just doesn't compare to Khan beating a fighter who is evenly-matched with Porter in a far, far superior fashion.