Better win - Brook > Porter or Khan > Alexander

[Dirk Diggler UK]

Devon Alexander has now lost 6 of his last 10 fights.

[bigjavi973]

That's the sort of thing peeps say when they can't actually provide any worthwhile argument.

Wrong. That's the sort of things peeps say when they are just laughing at you.

[FrankieClutch]

I was impressed with both wins, especially in the fashion that they were won. That said, the Porter win was much better

[Dirk Diggler UK]

What did people think was going to happen with Khan-Alexander?

Alexander was completely made for Khan. His only chance was landing some kind of once in a lifetime punch like he did against Urango. Otherwise Khan was always going to easily outpoint him.

Devon Alexander is one of the biggest duds in recent history. A complete underachiever considering his somewhat natural talent.

Shawn Porter is a terrible boxer. Really awful technique. Sloppy as ****. Yet he still managed to rag doll Devon like a little child.

And then Khan decides to fight that Devon

[Box-Office]

Good to see this crazy notion has been shot down bluntly. 5 shameless Khan fans are the only ones not voting for Porter - 3 of them even not shameless enough to vote for their own guy. Surprise. Saving face lads.

Why is box office not in this thread? Why are you running like Khan is from Brook?

You made this thread not that long ago, I go to uni full time plus work, why are you stooping so low to score imaginary points?


You should make a thread Khan vs Deakin and people will pick Robin by KO, point being you know people hate Khan regardless, so you now hide behind popular opinion. Most people here also count accomplishments post a certain fight ie Clinton Mitchell's legend grows everytime Hopkins achieves something.


Speaking of popular opinion, Warren's WW3 card struggled with tickets, yet people fill up Hearn's one sided **** fest (Warrington-Brunker had 10 K). So, your circle jerk tactic doesn't mean anything at all. You're entitled to believe as you wish, I respect it, but having a majority opinion doesn't mean you're correct.

[creekrat77]

I'd just have to go with Brooks win over Porter. Porter was much and still is a much fresher fighter. He has more heart than Devon, has size, decent skill, is stronger than Devon, but he lacks speed and agility when compared to Devon.

Khan did have a shut out over Devon. Which was pretty impressive. Devon is a fast, sharp, gritty fighter, but he really lacks power.

It's really hard to say which is the better win. I think it's kind of pathetic that Brooks best win is Porter and still isn't ready to step up and fight someone at that level again.

[Dirk Diggler UK]

On another note, how **** does that make Marcos Maidana look?

Alexander's only wins from his last 10 fights have been Randall Bailey, Jesus Soto-BumAss, Lee fking Purdy and yes.....a shutout victory over Marcos Maidana - another of Khan's best wins.

[LacedUp]

You made this thread not that long ago, I go to uni full time plus work, why are you stooping so low to score imaginary points?


You should make a thread Khan vs Deakin and people will pick Robin by KO, point being you know people hate Khan regardless, so you now hide behind popular opinion. Most people here also count accomplishments post a certain fight ie Clinton Mitchell's legend grows everytime Hopkins achieves something.


Speaking of popular opinion, Warren's WW3 card struggled with tickets, yet people fill up Hearn's one sided **** fest (Warrington-Brunker had 10 K). So, your circle jerk tactic doesn't mean anything at all. You're entitled to believe as you wish, I respect it, but having a majority opinion doesn't mean you're correct.

take your embarrassing Brook / Porter defeat like a man.

[STREET CLEANER]

Khan's win is better. Porter vs Alexander was almost a toss up, so was Brook vs Porter. Close fights which could have gone either way. They fight 10 times, they win 5 each. One judge had Brook vs Porter a draw.

Khan shutout Alexander for 12 rounds, the fight was the very definition of a mismatch.

So Khan's thoroughly dominating performance against a fighter who was very evenly matched with Porter was a better win than Brook's closely-contested Porter win.

No surprise here. The Brook/Porter was a close clear win for Brook against a young, live WW opponent

[FlatLine]

No surprise here. The Brook/Porter was a close clear win for Brook against a young, live WW opponent

It was a good win for Brook, but Alexander and Porter are practically evenly-matched (although they have different styles of course). They fight 5 times, they win 5 each. Khan beat Alexander more impressively than Brook beat (Alexander's equal) Porter. Again, I thought it was still an impressive showing by Brook and in fact the best performance of his career, but it was a much closer fight than Khan vs Alexander.