If Roman loses, does Andre Ward become p4p #1 fighter in the world?

Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • ////
    ////
    Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
    • Sep 2014
    • 14948
    • 952
    • 671
    • 111,577

    #1

    If Roman loses, does Andre Ward become p4p #1 fighter in the world?

    The past three years of Andre Ward's career:



    Meanwhile:

    Last edited by ////; 10-10-2015, 03:18 PM.
  • b00g13man
    Undisputed Champion
    Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
    • Dec 2012
    • 12197
    • 265
    • 51
    • 34,905

    #2
    Those names wouldn't look out of place in GGG's resume.

    Comment

    • Cuban Linx
      Undisputed Champion
      Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
      • Jun 2012
      • 4584
      • 128
      • 76
      • 10,938

      #3
      Well if he's no.2 currently then the most logical thing to do would be to move him to no.1 (if Roman loses). I think most have Ward as their no.1 guy anyway.

      Comment

      • ////
        ////
        Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
        • Sep 2014
        • 14948
        • 952
        • 671
        • 111,577

        #4
        Originally posted by b00g13man
        Those names wouldn't look out of place in GGG's resume.
        I'm not clear on what you're suggesting. Are you saying GGG should be p4p #1 instead since he's fought marginally better opposition, but far more of it?

        Ward has some good wins from years and years ago but all of those guys are retired or miserably past it by now. I'd like to see the formula for removing him from the list completely then promoting him to #2 for beating a campless uh *scrolls up* Paul Smith.

        Interestingly Wladimir Klitschko was poised to move into the #1 spot but Ring dropped him to #6 without any explanation days after floyd retired. Hmmm. I guess he didn't fit the image they were looking for.
        Last edited by ////; 10-10-2015, 03:21 PM.

        Comment

        • MDPopescu
          Undisputed Champion
          Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
          • Oct 2012
          • 24153
          • 1,504
          • 2,009
          • 4,138,611

          #5
          Of course.
          But not before he fights Sartison or Pavlik back from retirement & rehab.

          Comment

          • Calculating...
            Banned
            Silver Champion - 100-500 posts
            • Oct 2015
            • 225
            • 37
            • 53
            • 368

            #6
            Not a chance, what a joke. Ward has beaten no one of note for years, he doesn't even deserve top 5.

            Comment

            • 1hourRun
              SQUAD-UP!
              Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
              • Dec 2010
              • 20526
              • 2,789
              • 2,336
              • 140,312

              #7
              When Bradley robbed pac should Pac have been demoted? -- It all depends on how you lose imo.

              Comment

              • mathed
                molṑn labé
                Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                • Feb 2009
                • 54549
                • 2,741
                • 2,984
                • 224,675

                #8
                Originally posted by Cruisin'
                The past three years of Andre Ward's career:



                Meanwhile:

                Hell no, scrub is fighting on Bet against tincans.......

                Comment

                • jas
                  Voice of Reason
                  Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                  • Jul 2005
                  • 22496
                  • 932
                  • 907
                  • 1,059,614

                  #9
                  kovalev would be favourite vs ward no?

                  Comment

                  • b00g13man
                    Undisputed Champion
                    Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
                    • Dec 2012
                    • 12197
                    • 265
                    • 51
                    • 34,905

                    #10
                    Originally posted by Cruisin'
                    I'm not clear on what you're suggesting. Are you saying GGG should be p4p #1 instead since he's fought marginally better opposition, but far more of it?

                    Ward has some good wins from years and years ago but all of those guys are retired or miserably past it by now. I'd like to see the formula for removing him from the list completely then promoting him to #2 for beating a campless uh *scrolls up* Paul Smith.

                    Interestingly Wladimir Klitschko was poised to move into the #1 spot but Ring dropped him to #6 without any explanation days after floyd retired. Hmmm. I guess he didn't fit the image they were looking for.
                    Of course not. The big difference is that Ward actually has quality wins. GGG not so much.

                    Comment

                    Working...
                    TOP