Well if he's no.2 currently then the most logical thing to do would be to move him to no.1 (if Roman loses). I think most have Ward as their no.1 guy anyway.
Those names wouldn't look out of place in GGG's resume.
I'm not clear on what you're suggesting. Are you saying GGG should be p4p #1 instead since he's fought marginally better opposition, but far more of it?
Ward has some good wins from years and years ago but all of those guys are retired or miserably past it by now. I'd like to see the formula for removing him from the list completely then promoting him to #2 for beating a campless uh *scrolls up* Paul Smith.
Interestingly Wladimir Klitschko was poised to move into the #1 spot but Ring dropped him to #6 without any explanation days after floyd retired. Hmmm. I guess he didn't fit the image they were looking for.
I'm not clear on what you're suggesting. Are you saying GGG should be p4p #1 instead since he's fought marginally better opposition, but far more of it?
Ward has some good wins from years and years ago but all of those guys are retired or miserably past it by now. I'd like to see the formula for removing him from the list completely then promoting him to #2 for beating a campless uh *scrolls up* Paul Smith.
Interestingly Wladimir Klitschko was poised to move into the #1 spot but Ring dropped him to #6 without any explanation days after floyd retired. Hmmm. I guess he didn't fit the image they were looking for.
Of course not. The big difference is that Ward actually has quality wins. GGG not so much.
Comment