I pointed out that considering the fact that you seem to rate " Ring " so highly it must kill you that they rank Cotto as the best middleweight on the planet
Then you said.....
So I am asking you how you could possibly use Ring rankings to justify Golovkins poor resume', when you admit that their ranking system is flawed and that it obviously " needs to be rectified "?
Smarten up !
And, I told you already..... historians would prefer to judge Golovkin on his level of opposition, not on how many mediocre fighters managed to obtain a high ranking with a corrupt sanctioning body during a dead middleweight era.
Fcuk are you ******. Cotto is above GGG in every decent ranking, not just Rings I told you dozens times. That's cause most everybody ranks lineal champ #1 by default. GGG is not gonna rectify it by changing how rankings are done, idiot, he'll do it in the ring or by getting the champ to drop the belt in disgrace
Fcuk are you ******. Cotto is above GGG in every decent ranking, not just Rings I told you dozens times. That's cause most everybody ranks lineal champ #1 by default. GGG is not gonna rectify it by changing how rankings are done, idiot, he'll do it in the ring or by getting the champ to drop the belt in disgrace
Fcuk are you ******. Cotto is above GGG in every decent ranking, not just Rings I told you dozens times. That's cause most everybody ranks lineal champ #1 by default. GGG is not gonna rectify it by changing how rankings are done, idiot, he'll do it in the ring or by getting the champ to drop the belt in disgrace
1) If they are obviously wrong, how are they decent ?
2) Why would you spout something that was obviously wrong ?
3) Why doesn't your common-sense override opinions that are obviously incorrect?
4) Why would you then repeat those incorrect opinions to me and state them as fact, you ass-hat?
1) If they are obviously wrong, how are they decent ?
2) Why would you spout something that was obviously wrong ?
3) Why doesn't your common-sense override opinions that are obviously incorrect?
4) Why would you then repeat those incorrect opinions to me and state them as fact, you ass-hat?
Because these guys are much smarter, much more knowledgeable than you so they abide by a principle. It's not perfect, but works much of the time. Here it fails, so luckily we have the mando to make it right.
His justification that ranking organisations use lineage is even more inaccurate.
Lol you can't be this ******. Ranking orgs don't go by lineage , duh. Every decent independent ranking does: Ring, ESPN, scene, tbrb. You sorry idiot lol
Because these guys are much smarter, much more knowledgeable than you so they abide by a principle. It's not perfect, but works much of the time. Here it fails, so luckily we have the mando to make it right.
Let me point out your ******ity, again.....
You state that they are smarter than me, and yet you admit that their ranking system is flawed and that it obviously " needs to be rectified
If they were smarter than me, they wouldn't be saying that Cotto is the best middleweight on the planet
Comment