Comments Thread For: GGG's Coach Explains Why Andre Ward is Not Relevant

[HeroBando]

It must kill you that Ring ranks Cotto as the best middleweight on the planet

It doesn't, ******, I know how boxing works and why Cotto is #1. It's something that needs to be rectified. I already explained this many times before lol, but you never learn, moron

[HeroBando]

I've never once said Golovkin should "drop everything" and fight Ward or Lara. He wants to wait for the Cotto/Alvarez winner. There's nothing wrong with that.

You are very likely the hypocrite here, just like 90% of this fanbase who in the past year have gone from "chicken Cotto and chicken Quillin and chicken everyone, LOL what are you accountants why do you care so much about PPVs and A-side?" to a bunch of wannabe promoters making every excuse you criticize every other fighter for making.

I like Golovkin. It's his fans I criticize, because right now they are the biggest bunch of scared children among the entire boxing fanbase. Unlike you and the rest of the fanbase shaking in bed at night and trying to pretend Ward doesn't exist, I think Golovkin can win that fight and want to see it. It's a real shame his supposed "fans" don't have more confidence in him.

What kind of dumb comparison is this? Those guys competed in the same division, were offered title shots for more money than they could get elsewhere, or had Ggg as their mando. Show me one guy in boxing that went up in weight for a p4p #2 who's a lot less marketable yet wants purse parity. Now same question, with the smaller guy being mando for 3 belts plus lineal against the biggest star around

[Jubei]

Abel even has to explain to you that Ward is not relevant, even though anyone with half a brain knows it already.

Of course Ward is not relevant.

He should be called the most irrelevant man in boxing, his name only comes up in jon****ion with the new king of the sport.

Fame also brings haters along and the haters create myths and are living off their wet fantasies about a guy that might defeat the monster that GGG is.

Even though they have to ally with the most irrelevant partysnoozer Irrelevant Ward. So funny LMAO.

[hitking]

Off to boxrec to look at resumes?
"MMMMMMUUUUUUUH RESUUUUMEEEEEEE!" lol

Hell I use boxrec all the time for GGG. Hadn't heard of most of the people on his resume.

[Progrssive_Jedi]

True fans know fighters

It doesn't, ******, I know how boxing works and why Cotto is #1. It's something that needs to be rectified. I already explained this many times before lol, but you never learn, moron

Agreed, it's a travesty that it is the case.

What kind of dumb comparison is this? Those guys competed in the same division, were offered title shots for more money than they could get elsewhere, or had Ggg as their mando. Show me one guy in boxing that went up in weight for a p4p #2 who's a lot less marketable yet wants purse parity. Now same question, with the smaller guy being mando for 3 belts plus lineal against the biggest star around

Right, it's not that hard. But still they insist.

I guess the fact GGG has a shot to do big things has scrambled their heads.

Abel even has to explain to you that Ward is not relevant, even though anyone with half a brain knows it already.

Of course Ward is not relevant.

He should be called the most irrelevant man in boxing, his name only comes up in jon****ion with the new king of the sport.

Fame also brings haters along and the haters create myths and are living off their wet fantasies about a guy that might defeat the monster that GGG is.

Even though they have to ally with the most irrelevant partysnoozer Irrelevant Ward. So funny LMAO.

Lol! Well said.

Hell I use boxrec all the time for GGG. Hadn't heard of most of the people on his resume.

That's because you know so little.

Every wonder why so many so called Boxing experts a big on GGG.

Well it's the same reason those who defended the run, clinch, hug style of Ward and Floyd.

GGG is everything Floyd isn't.

He's:

A. Fighter. Comes to put on a show, not just win.
B. Rarely holds and clinches.
C. Doesn't flaunt his wealth. He doesn't have Floyd money (but he is gonna have a lot), but he is wealthy.
D. He is respectful.

GGAg proves everything they've been saying for years is wrong. You don't have to be a CoWard who hugs for 12 rounds to win. You don't have to be hated to get big.

GGG has a KO streak that makes any fighter envy him.

Funny thing is, all the fighters have fought similar quality fights at one time, but do all of them destroy them?

[hitking]

That's because you know so little.

Every wonder why so many so called Boxing experts a big on GGG.

Well it's the same reason those who defended the run, clinch, hug style of Ward and Floyd.

GGG is everything Floyd isn't.

He's:

A. Fighter. Comes to put on a show, not just win.
B. Rarely holds and clinches.
C. Doesn't flaunt his wealth. He doesn't have Floyd money (but he is gonna have a lot), but he is wealthy.
D. He is respectful.

GGAg proves everything they've been saying for years is wrong. You don't have to be a CoWard who hugs for 12 rounds to win. You don't have to be hated to get big.

GGG has a KO streak that makes any fighter envy him.

Funny thing is, all the fighters have fought similar quality fights at one time, but do all of them destroy them?

Because I know so little. Hmmm. I don't think not being familiar with a good portion of GGG's resume puts me in the minority. Matter of fact. You're not familiar with the majority of GGG's resume. Getting on youtube and watching all his past fights doesn't make you an expert.

As for you, "GGG is everything Floyd isn't" bull****. You're absolutely right.

A. Floyd fought the best jr lightweight in the world a year into his pro career. That single win trumps everything GGG has done in the boxing ring in the last decade.

B. GGG is below average defensively. Which nowadays is called, "coming to fight." Or, "coming to put on a show."

C. Who gives a **** about Floyd, GGG, or the guy that hands you your burger at McDonald's money. As long as the get it legally, burn it, BBQ it, I don't give a f.uck.

D. He's respectful. Exactly how the f.uck do you know? You don't know that man. All you know is the 5% of his life that's publicised. GGG could be the biggest piece of **** to ever ealk the face of the Earth behind closed doors. As a fresh faced, blue chip prospect, Floyd was once promoted as an All American kid. The anti-Floyd eyes you have for GGG were once the same ones mist had for Manny Pacquiao. Who's one of the biggest douchebags to walk the face of the Earth.

As for GGG's KO streak. I could KO 50 girls tomorrow. Does that mean I can fight. Its not about how you win. Its about who you beat. And all these holding "cowards" you speak of have multiple wins that would easily be GGG's career best win.

[i'm a fun haver]

Hell I use boxrec all the time for GGG. Hadn't heard of most of the people on his resume.

That's because you don't follow boxing.
You pretend to be a Ward/Lara fan because GGG hurts your feelings.
Cornball

[Ganondorf]

Not reading this he-said, she-said garbage. Both fighters need to step up their level of competition.

[b00g13man]

He's a butt ugly fighter with zero charisma and a very bland fighting style who hasn't done anything in several years but sue his promoter and call out Golovkin/Klitschko for fantasy fights that will never happen.

There's a reason he can't sell tickets in his home town (Despite refusing to fight anywhere else), it's because nobody knows who he is.

Just talkin business here.

"We won't fight you because you're butt ugly". That's a new one.

[hitking]

That's because you don't follow boxing.
You pretend to be a Ward/Lara fan because GGG hurts your feelings.
Cornball

Yeah, that's exactly what's going on.