Comments Thread For: Fortune: Khan is a Wuss, Pacquiao F***ing KO's Him!

[FlatLine]

Dropping names but none of those guys were at the top at the time Khan faced em? Were they? ur overrating them..cmon guy.

Look, in boxing when a fighter loses...his rating drops, right? So lets look at Khans best WW win, Alexander. Did he not get beat and lose his title before facing Khan? And again, Algieri is NOT RATED AT 147! Collazo lost his title in 07! Its 2015!! Cmon guy! Lol

As for Brook and Thurman, theyve both earned their standing properly by beating a legitimate top WW...for instance, Diego Chavez tight now is rated #7 at 147...has Khan EVER faced a WELTERWEIGHT rated ad high as that??? Hint: NO

Ratings are often misleading and not representative of actual skill level. In many cases they are manipulated by the sanctioning bodies, often with some sort of persuasion from a promoter. Chaves only got that rating because he got a draw with a Bradley who decided to brawl instead of use his boxing ability because he has been affected by the backlash from the first Pacquiao fight. Bradley is a much better boxer than Chaves, but he tried to outbrawl him just like he did with Provo. That's actually a very good example of how ratings are not reflective of actual skill level. It's a farce.

Both Algieri and Alexander would beat Chaves fairly easy. So again, Khan has consistently fought better opposition than all the other guys.

[FlatLine]

khan's management intentionally avoids putting him in with guys who have power, see above.

Porters last three are CLEARLY better. Thurmans is on the same level.

Broner is a hugely overrated fighter who could easily have 5 losses on his record against Ponce De Leon, Malignaggi, Quintero, Maidana and Porter.

Brook only beat Porter after studying Julio Diaz game plan in the first Porter fight since Diaz essentially laid out the blueprint to beat Porter. Brook followed it very closely and threw in a lot of clinching too.

All their opponents could well get beaten by Algieri and Alexander in reality so again, Khan has fought the better opposition consistently.

[alexguiness]

Khan is just fine fighting weak fisted opponents.

Avoiding Brook tells the whole story.

He is cherry picking, with a begging bowl.

Sad sight to see.

[Lou Cipher]

Hey Turd Breath, theres a big difference between playing it safe and riding it out when you're hurt. Where do you "people" come from?

[M Bison]

Broner is a hugely overrated fighter who could easily have 5 losses on his record against Ponce De Leon, Malignaggi, Quintero, Maidana and Porter.

Brook only beat Porter after studying Julio Diaz game plan in the first Porter fight since Diaz essentially laid out the blueprint to beat Porter. Brook followed it very closely and threw in a lot of clinching too.

All their opponents could well get beaten by Algieri and Alexander in reality so again, Khan has fought the better opposition consistently.

Exactly, why would anyone need to duck Kell Brook?
Guy is absolutely average as the eye can see, overrated hype-job that is waiting to be exposed If the ref did his job right when he fought Porter, Porter likely would have hurt Kell Brook a lot.

[VG_Addict]

Khan has no ring IQ.

[Andy7]

Khan has unfinished business with Prescott, Pererson and Garcia. End thread.

[sako5]

Khan has no ring IQ.

It's safe to say he has no IQ period.