That's like rewarding basketball players for missed shots. The Bulls outscored the Lakers 120-110 but the Lakers took way more shots and were more exciting.
LMAO...this thread is ****** and a ploy to cheat the system for lesser skilled fighters...FOH with that...
Idk about a major scoring criteria. I think it should be among the criteria judges use & I tend to think they already do. If a round is even-ish I'll tend to give the round to the aggressive guy (effective or not) & it seems like thats typically the case with judges.
Idk about a major scoring criteria. I think it should be among the criteria judges use & I tend to think they already do. If a round is even-ish I'll tend to give the round to the aggressive guy (effective or not) & it seems like thats typically the case with judges.
That's like rewarding basketball players for missed shots. The Bulls outscored the Lakers 120-110 but the Lakers took way more shots and were more exciting.
But they got to the line more often than the bulls.
The scroring criteria itself should be disregarded, leaves too much room for robbery. I mean how hard is it to score a fight. The guy getting his ass whip is the loser.
Comment