Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Should Ineffective Aggression Be Regarded As A Major Scoring Criteria?

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #11
    Yes and shots which miss the goal should be awarded as goals in football.

    Comment


    • #12
      Originally posted by PBP. View Post
      Lmao....ineffective offense = points?

      That's like rewarding basketball players for missed shots. The Bulls outscored the Lakers 120-110 but the Lakers took way more shots and were more exciting.
      LMAO...this thread is ****** and a ploy to cheat the system for lesser skilled fighters...FOH with that...

      Comment


      • #13
        Idk about a major scoring criteria. I think it should be among the criteria judges use & I tend to think they already do. If a round is even-ish I'll tend to give the round to the aggressive guy (effective or not) & it seems like thats typically the case with judges.

        Comment


        • #14
          Originally posted by Eff Pandas View Post
          Idk about a major scoring criteria. I think it should be among the criteria judges use & I tend to think they already do. If a round is even-ish I'll tend to give the round to the aggressive guy (effective or not) & it seems like thats typically the case with judges.
          ^^^ this right here...

          Comment


          • #15
            Originally posted by PBP. View Post
            Lmao....ineffective offense = points?

            That's like rewarding basketball players for missed shots. The Bulls outscored the Lakers 120-110 but the Lakers took way more shots and were more exciting.
            But they got to the line more often than the bulls.

            Comment


            • #16
              It already is. If a round is even it will generally go to the aggressor regardless of effectiveness.

              Comment


              • #17
                How do you think Pep won a round without throwing a punch?

                Ineffective aggression equals strong defense for your opponent, which is a point in his favor.

                Comment


                • #18
                  No it shouldn't because

                  If a guy caught doing IV at home 14x over the legal limit is doing no wrong the I don't see why it should.

                  Comment


                  • #19
                    no because its ineffective

                    Comment


                    • #20
                      The scroring criteria itself should be disregarded, leaves too much room for robbery. I mean how hard is it to score a fight. The guy getting his ass whip is the loser.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X
                      TOP