Well first off he hasn't fought for 33 years. He's been a pro since 2006, so he's had a 9 year career. He could do a lot worse in 9 believe me. It took Kell Brook 10 years to get his notable win against Porter. Other guys have taken longer, some guys have done it sooner.
Comments Thread For: Froch: Andre Ward is P4P 1, Golovkin Not in My Top Ten
Collapse
-
-
-
Well first off he hasn't fought for 33 years. He's been a pro since 2006, so he's had a 9 year career. He could do a lot worse in 9 believe me. It took Kell Brook 10 years to get his notable win against Porter. Other guys have taken longer, some guys have done it sooner.
Exactly WHO has the Triple Duck ever beaten?Comment
-
SPot on.
Hey, I actually like GGG as a fighter, I think he has a=some skill and has shown great power. But he is 34 years old and has fought no one, he deserves to be questioned for this fact. He's been a pro for a decade, you're telling me he hasn't been able to fight anyone of note for 10 years?
He's simply not a proven top 10 P4P fighter no matter what HBO says. Maybe he'll start fighting some non tomato cans, but Lemiuex is another nobody that any good fighter should beat easily.
Way I see it, his resume is set in stone...if fighters in the past like Dempsey can go 3 or more years without defending their titles because they are living it up, im not gonna penalize a proven fighter in his prime and lower him p4p....He only missed one full year. IMO Ward is the best P4P and has been number 2 to me since he won the super 6.....if he and everyone else were the same size I'd favor him to win.....If he fought GGG he wins, if he moves up to 175 he'd beat KOV and Stevenson in my book......He is more proven than them, younger with a better resumeComment
-
He stated why Golovikin not in top 10 because his resume is pure horse**** which it is but we going go with the everyone ducking him excuse almost 10 years pro and being duckedComment
-
Comment
-
Comment