Comments Thread For: Froch: Andre Ward is P4P 1, Golovkin Not in My Top Ten

[Nay_Sayer]

Geale had already lost to Mundine and Barker. He was promptly knocked out by a JMW after Golovkin.

Martin Murray has never beaten a soul, his claim to fame is two close fights he didn't win.

So that leaves Golovkin with... well... NOTHING! See how easy that is?

^This right here...

[Nay_Sayer]

Grouch resume is only considered good because of his skill level.

Let GGG fight all those same guys at the same time Froch did and I bet he wouldn't get half as much credit after knocking them all out.

The Ward that Froch faced would have KO'ed Bumlovkin...

[Nay_Sayer]

Froch never belonged in a P4P top 10 list.
Ward is Froch's daddy.
Golovkin is a better fighter than Froch.

Not according to their resumes. Froch's resume takes a HUGE dump on Bumlovkin's.

[Dirk Diggler UK]

haha and yet your the one who keeps begging him to fight ward. Unlike other Golovkin fanboys, I take it as a compliment. I mean the only challenge for GGG is a p4p fighter in a higher weight class? haha danm could you have said the same for Froch?

Wake me up when Little G is ready to graduate from the kiddy table.

[HURTFEELINGS]

This has been a great read...Its nice to see, not everyone has lost there damn mind about this can-crusher. And fighting Pepe lemieux (who was beat by RUBIO, DOESNT GET HIM THERE) Its like when all the other boxers both TBE and Pac fought kept saying Mayweather would win, and the same people were losing there minds, even when the trainers were giving there opinions, novice fan boys cried their eyes out. Boxers know BOXING better than pc warriors. But this was hilarious reading it, his best win was Martin Murray a guy who lost his biggest fights, lol

[Teetotaler]

Wake me up when Little G is ready to graduate from the kiddy table.

haha the worst part is your pathetic insults are better than frochs resume

[PAC-BOY]

LOL how can a fighter go on cruise control for years and still be a P4P thought?

[aboutfkntime]

whoever has GGG top ten p4p is a moron

there are too many fighters with similar or more talent and they have far better resumes than he has

this dude is 34 years old and never beat 1 reigning champion or major titleholder.......won a "regular" title.....was elevated to full champion status.

Only former or current titleholders he has beat in 33 fights is a shot Kassim Ouma, Daniel Geale......that's not the stuff that make a p4p guy....He has to actually beat an elite fighter to get that status

Ward was out because of injury and Managerial issues, he earned his place

and we already know what Ward is capable of....on the elite level their are more questions about GGG than Answers

I agree with Froch, no idea how Golovkin could be ranked P4P.

I gave up on P4P years back because of this type of reasoning.

Put it this way..... identical criteria must be applied to a P4P list, otherwise it is just a "favorite fighter" list. Considering that fact, what criteria could possibly justify ranking Golovkin higher than Pacquiao?

You pacfans who jumped onto the Golovkin bandwagon must be horribly confused by that

[The plunger man]

Being english I had a lot of respect for froch....especially when he came back to beat bute...showed warrior heart.....then after the first groves fight his interview he made an arrogant **** of himself and never gave credit for the fight groves gave him..kind of bad sportsmanship...glad he won the rematch as well....now with golovkin....golovkin has never spoke anything wrong about him......froch was offered big money to fight golovkin and he decided not to take the test and he retired....my views are if he was not in your top 10 p4p list then it would have been big money for an easy payday so fight him.......what's interesting everybody has a view on golovkin but not many seem eager to fight him.....golovkin has all the tools

[aboutfkntime]

Ward has a very strong argument but IMO no clear 1

It depends.

The criteria would need to be defined.

If the criteria is current, then that rules out Ward completely.

If the criteria is resume, then that rules out Golovkin.

But there is no criteria to justify ranking Golovkin ahead of Pacquiao.