Comments Thread For: Merchant Gives His Take on Mayweather IV Scandal
Collapse
-
Most likely? LOL. You know what' definite? You not knowing.Comment
-
Do you know definitely that there are no gremlins? You are trying to make this an absolute argument because you know that you have no reasonable argument. The standard we use in the real world is responsibility not possibility. You are simply ******.Comment
-
No, I'm trying to have an absolute argument because everything else is hearsay. Or bull****. Like your "most likely."Comment
-
Define hearsay you ****ing idiot! I know what hearsay is you moron. You obviously dont. You are simply a ****** **** repeating things you heard on some legal drama.Comment
-
That's what YOU said
Tell me, which court should they present it to? I mean, there's some trial going on, right?
****ing clown.Comment
-
Are you saying that USDA presented no evidence in its response to Hauser?
Also everyone just saw that you sidestepped defining hearsay because you dont know what it is because you are a ****ing moron using big sounding words.Comment
-
Do you think I take you serious? Aren't you the same poster claiming Conte was reformed? Yeah that was you. Got all upset and huffy. Kinda like what you're doing now. Why is it so personal to you? Pray, tell.Comment
-
What do you call the documentation surrounding Mayweathers TUE?
Do you think I take you serious?
You are afraid of me. That much is obvious.Comment
-
What do you call the documentation surrounding Mayweathers TUE?
Obviously because you are too afraid to say what you think hearsay is. The fact that you wont fight me shows that you are a coward. If you believed you were correctly using the word hearsay you would argue it. Instead you know I'm smarter than you, and as such most likely correct, so you are trying to change the subject.
You are afraid of me. That much is obvious.@ the bolded
You think if I didn't know what the word meant I couldn't just google it? Nah, I'm just not going to be sidetracked by another bruised b*tch on the internet.
No one has to present any "evidence" to you. And since there isn't a court case going on, no one has to provide hard docs either. Do you think they provided Hauser with the 2700 pages of medical docs? If not, I guess they're lying about that too? See how ****** your reasoning is? Probably not.Comment
Comment